John Powers and Cheryl Coon discuss framing COA endpoints, emphasizing the importance of protocol clarity, treatment benefits, evidence, and patient-centric analysis. They also explore the complexities of specifying endpoints, the balance between specificity and broadness, and the innovative approach to developing outcome measures in clinical trials.
Specifying COA endpoints involves framing endpoints relevant to population, intervention, and timing for impact assessment.
Endpoint selection in clinical trials requires reflecting treatment goals, disease progression, and aligning with regulatory frameworks.
Deep dives
Defining Endpoints and Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials
When considering clinical outcome assessments (COAs) in intervention development, the focus lies on specifying endpoints relevant to the population, intervention, context, and hypothesis. Endpoints encapsulate measures, including timing and estimated treatment effects, aiming to demonstrate the impact of interventions on patients' lives. Careful consideration of when and how to measure endpoints is vital, balancing the need for comprehensive data collection with participant burden.
Aligning Endpoints with Treatment Expectations
The relevance of endpoints in clinical trials hinges on aligning with treatment expectations and disease manifestations. Endpoints should reflect what the treatment aims to achieve, considering the broader impact on patients beyond singular symptoms. Understanding the interplay between disease progression and treatment effects informs endpoint selection, ensuring measurements resonate with patients, clinicians, and regulators.
Estimand Framework for Endpoint Specification
The Estimand Framework emphasizes specificity in defining endpoints, incorporating population characteristics, event considerations, and statistical analysis plans. Addressing intercurrent events and handling data interpretation upfront enhances trial robustness. Balancing precision and interpretability in endpoint specification enables aligning trial objectives with patient needs, regulatory expectations, and statistical rigor.
How do we specify clinical outcome assessment endpoints?
In this COA in PROgress podcast episode John Powers and Cheryl Coon offer insight into how to frame an endpoint that contains clinical outcome assessment data.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode