AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
This episode presents the first episode of a new series called Self-Legitimating Johnsons (SLJs), aimed at aspiring thinkers. The hosts emphasize the importance of obtaining better clarity on one's ideas and contributions to foster engagement and discussion. They hope to help listeners find the symbolic significance in their projects to attract attention and facilitate meaningful contributions. The episode encourages listeners to stay engaged and hints at upcoming opportunities to get involved in discussions and have their work evaluated.
A significant focus of the episode is on socio-analysis and its connection to psychoanalysis, addressing epistemological issues in social science. The hosts discuss relevant concepts such as field, habitus, and various forms of capital. They outline their unique perspective on these concepts, derived from a blend of Marxist and existential philosophy, utilizing theorists like Bourdieu, Heidegger, and Goggins. The aim is to present a nuanced approach to understanding social dynamics and their implications for contemporary issues.
The discussion includes reading from Pierre Bourdieu's lectures, which are noted for being more accessible than dense theoretical texts. Bourdieu's work blends sociology and criticism, focusing on issues like class distinctions and the intricate social structures that define these categories. The episode invites listeners to engage with Bourdieu’s ideas while also encouraging subscribers to share their insights and experiences related to these themes. The hosts suggest that by connecting with Bourdieu’s teachings, participants can enhance their understanding of social structures and their own positions within them.
The hosts highlight the challenges associated with knowledge production and the complexities of social classifications. They emphasize that individuals' social positions can significantly influence how they classify others and themselves. This discussion leads to an analysis of the various forms of capital and recognition that individuals navigate in social systems. The exploration of these concepts serves to illustrate how social hierarchies can shape perceptions and behaviors within different contexts.
The conversation addresses the interactions between individuals and institutions that shape knowledge in academia. The challenges of classification arise as sociologists must grapple with personas they encounter and classify, often based on pre-existing systems. This examination of knowledge production reveals how classifications can obscure reality and lead to misunderstandings. By engaging critically with their approaches, listeners are encouraged to reconsider their assumptions and expand their perspectives on social interactions.
Classifications in society are explored as both tools and traps that can limit understanding. The hosts emphasize that classifications such as race and class are not simply descriptive but can also reinforce existing social hierarchies. Notably, individuals in positions of authority, such as teachers and officials, wield significant power in determining which classifications are deemed valid. By recognizing the implications of these classifications, listeners can develop a more nuanced understanding of their own social realities.
The episode discusses the dynamics of power embedded in social classifications, illustrating how authority can shape perceptions and reinforce disparities. Using examples, the hosts illustrate how social classifications can alter individuals' identities and experiences, particularly when legitimization comes from institutional sources. This exploration of how classifications affect social interactions sheds light on the broader implications for those who inhabit these roles. The conversation underscores the importance of questioning the underlying motivations of classifications in order to understand their real-world consequences.
The hosts introduce the notion of the insult as a critical aspect of social interaction and classification. They discuss how insults, as performative acts, carry significant social weight and can shape individuals' identities. The idea is posited that categories like 'idiot' carry both social and personal significance, reflecting the dynamics of power within social structures. This examination leads to a broader understanding of how classification systems can reinforce exclusionary practices and ideologies.
The relationship between various classifications is examined, emphasizing how they intersect and inform one another. The hosts illustrate this by observing how societal norms and expectations can dictate classifications of individuals based on their characteristics or behaviors. They argue that these intersections create complex power dynamics that challenge simplistic categorizations. By shedding light on these interrelations, listeners can better navigate their own experiences within societal classifications.
In the context of classifications, the episode emphasizes the significant authority held by classifiers within social systems. The hosts illustrate that too often, these classifiers lack accountability, leading to detrimental effects on individuals who fall outside of accepted norms. The idea that classification creates responsibilities for those who wield power is brought to light, yet many avoid these consequences. This reflection on responsibility highlights the need for a more ethical approach to classification within society.
The episode encourages a reevaluation of existing sociological methodologies, particularly in how they defined categories and classifications. The hosts highlight the need for sociologists to critically assess their own biases and the implications of their classifications. In doing so, they argue for a more holistic understanding of individuals' experiences that transcends simplistic labels. This call for reflective practice stresses the importance of ensuring that sociology remains a relevant and ethical discipline.
As the discussion wraps up, the hosts reiterate the significance of understanding the complexities of classifying individuals within society. They stress that future conversations should prioritize critical analyses of how classifications are created and their social implications. By fostering an environment that encourages questioning dominant narratives, listeners can contribute to a more equitable understanding of identity and agency. This concluding sentiment underscores the ongoing struggle against reductive classifications and the importance of dialogue.
Classification Struggles - Socioanalysis - Epistemically Rigorous Social Theory - Pierre Bourdieu
ABOUT
Theory Underground is a research, publishing, and lecture institute. TU exists to develop the concept of timenergy in the context of critical social theory (CST). To get basically situated in this field you will have to know a handful of important figures from a bunch of areas of the humanities and social sciences. That would be a lot of work for you if not for the fact that Dave, Ann, and Mikey are consolidating hundreds of thousands of hours of effort into a pirate TV-radio-press that goes on tours and throws conferences and stuff. Enjoy a ton of its content here for free or get involved to access courses and the ongoing research seminars.
GET INVOLVED or SUPPORT
Get TU books at a discount: https://theoryunderground.com/publications
CREDITS / LINKS
Missed a course at Theory Underground? Wrong! Courses at Theory Underground are available after the fact on demand via the membership. https://theoryunderground.com/courses
If you want to help TU in a totally gratuitous way, or support, here is a way to buy something concrete and immediately useful https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/2MAWFYUJQIM58?
Buy Dave and Ann a coffee date: https://www.venmo.com/u/theoryunderground https://paypal.me/theorypleeb
If Theory Underground has helped you see that text-to-speech technologies are a useful way of supplementing one’s reading while living a busy life, if you want to be able to listen to PDFs for yourself, then Speechify is recommended. Use the link below and Theory Underground gets credit! https://share.speechify.com/mzwBHEB
Follow Theory Underground on Duolingo: https://invite.duolingo.com/BDHTZTB5CWWKTP747NSNMAOYEI
See Theory Underground memes and get occasional updates or thoughts via the Instagram :
https://www.instagram.com/theory_underground
MUSIC CREDITS Logo sequence music by https://olliebeanz.com/music https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode Mike Chino, Demigods https://youtu.be/M6wruxDngOk
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode