Opening Arguments

OA593: Roe Was Never About a 'Right to Abortion'

May 6, 2022

01:03:37

Creator website

Highlights

AI Chapters

Episode notes

Bowers v. United States

03:43

I'm a Gay Couple, and I Love My Gay Friends, and I Love Them

02:35

I'm Not Married, Too Bad on You

04:23

Introduction

2min

The New Fantastic Meit Is Energized

4min

We Will Undermine Our Own Selves. Thank You Very Much

2min

I've Never Been More Like Could Go Any Way on the Leak

2min

Will the Supreme Court's Draft Opposition Be a Lot More Softened?

3min

What Happens Once the Bill Passes?

3min

The Reliance Interest

2min

Is There a Principle of Law and Order That Says, OK, This Has Been We Undo This Law?

5min

Ex Chair, O a Dot Com

5min

10.

The Constitutional Right to a Blow Job

2min

11.

I'm a Gay Couple, and I Love My Gay Friends, and I Love Them

3min

12.

I'm Not Married, Too Bad on You

4min

13.

The Right to a Blossom

3min

14.

Lawrence v. Texas

3min

15.

Bowers v. United States

4min

16.

History and Traditions in the Past Half Century

1min

17.

The European Court of Human Rights Considered a Case With Parallels to Bowers

5min

18.

Thank You to Our New Patrons at Patrion Dot Com Slash Law

3min

19.

Do You See a Blue Car Run a Red Light?

2min

20.

Is Hearsay Inadmissible?

4min

21.

Open Armian Media - Opening Arguments

2min

It is absurd to say "point to where in the Constitution it says you have a right to an abortion." Legally speaking, there's something a lot deeper and more basic going on. As we all already know, this leaked decision makes a mockery of the law. Andrew has some further deep-diving for us on how the court, a mere 20 years ago, ruled in the opposite direction on similar legal questions. Many of the same Justices were a part of that ruling. Listen and learn!

Links: Court press release, Draft Dobbs opinion, Abortion Policy in the Absence of Roe | Guttmacher Institute, Hodes & Nauser v. Schmidt, 87(R) SB 8, Arkansas SB 149 (2019), Lawrence v. Texas, Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986), Carey v. Population Services Int'l, 431 U. S. 678 (1977)