The unjust detention of Mahmoud Khalil raises alarms about free speech and immigration rights. His case spotlights how Cold War-era laws are being misused, highlighting the dangers to civic liberties. Activism intertwined with legal challenges showcases the complexities faced by advocates for Palestinian rights. The episode humorously contrasts this with the legal antics of a January 6th defendant, illustrating the absurdities in the justice system. It underscores the urgent need for activism and clarity in immigration processes.

In this thought-provoking discussion, Jenessa Seymour, a disability voting access advocate and New York attorney, delves into the implications of the SAVE Act on voting rights. She highlights how this legislation could disenfranchise millions, particularly marginalized groups. Jenessa shares personal anecdotes that illustrate the critical barriers faced in the pursuit of accessible voting. The conversation urges civic engagement and accountability to combat these threats, emphasizing the urgency for Democrats to act and protect election integrity.

Lindsay Owens, the executive director of the Groundwork Collaborative, dives into the complex narratives surrounding the economy, emphasizing how public perception often overlooks harsh realities. She discusses the alarming rise of inflation and its connection to corporate profiteering rather than just consumer costs. Lindsay also sheds light on the critical loss of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which plays a vital role in protecting citizens from financial exploitation. Expect insights on strategic investments and the need for clearer economic messaging to empower everyday Americans.

Get ready for a whirlwind of political insight! The Supreme Court's recent rulings spark lively discussions about judicial authority and government funding for humanitarian aid. Boston's Mayor Wu shines in a congressional hearing, passionately defending immigrant contributions against a tide of criticism. The debate also highlights significant legislative wins for trans rights, showcasing the resilience of blue city mayors. With a sprinkle of humor, the dynamics of political maneuvering and media reactions keep the conversation engaging and thought-provoking.

Dive into the chaotic aftermath of a Trump address as Democrats showcase their diverse strategies for resistance. From personal impacts on vulnerable citizens to the challenge of interpreting political theater, the hosts probe the fine line between activism and self-care. Discover the quirky legalities surrounding corn sales, and enjoy playful debates on tort law involving an axe-wielding pub owner. With humor threaded throughout, the discussion balances serious critique with lighthearted moments and community gratitude.

This discussion kicks off with a surprising twist from the Supreme Court, revealing both good and troubling news regarding federal funding and immigration requirements. Delve into the controversies of alien registration and its echoes from history, specifically during World War I, while unpacking the unjust implications of such policies. The narrative twists through judicial complexities, featuring an intriguing lawyer's unexpected allegiance to Trump, raising ethical questions against a backdrop of legal drama. It’s a wild ride through the intersection of law, history, and personal motives.

Anne Linder, managing member of ZVM Law, dives deep into the sensational legal battle between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni. The discussion tackles the polarized opinions surrounding the case, which intertwines themes of masculinity and the Me Too movement. Linder illustrates the complexities of public complaints and dives into the significance of navigating social media narratives. With a touch of humor, they highlight the extensive legal research involved and the challenges faced in adapting personal storytelling for film, shedding light on celebrity culture and media representation.

In this discussion, Amanda Litman, co-founder and president of Run for Something, emphasizes the organization's mission to empower young people to run for state and local office. She highlights the impact of diverse candidates and encourages grassroots involvement. Amanda stresses authenticity in politics and shares insights on the challenges aspiring candidates face, along with strategies for overcoming them. The conversation is filled with optimism for upcoming elections and practical advice for anyone considering a political run.

Michael Teeter, Managing Director of The 65 Project, discusses the urgent need for accountability among lawyers involved in undermining democracy during the 2020 election aftermath. He shares insights on how the organization determines which misconduct warrants bar complaints. The conversation highlights the challenges faced in holding legal professionals accountable and the critical role lawyers play in upholding the rule of law amid rising authoritarianism. Teeter also outlines the implications for the legal profession as the 2024 election approaches.

Brought to you by Trade Coffee! Get up to 3 bags free with any new Trade subscription at drinktrade.com/OA OA 1128 - First: an urgent question from a patron on Trump’s latest executive power grab. Matt explains the history of the “unitary executive theory” and the Federalist Society-backed movement to give the President more power than an actual king.  Then: Rutgers Law professor Katie Eyer studies, teaches, and litigates the law of anti-discrimination with a specialty in LGBTQ rights. She joins to discuss the current state of the law in the shadow of the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision in U.S. v. Skrmetti and the wake of Donald Trump’s recent anti-trans executive orders. Which, if any, of these orders should we actually be concerned about? What does it mean that the fight for trans lives is now becoming a federal issue?  Can Trump really just instruct the federal government to ignore the Supreme Court’s extension of employment protections to LGBTQ employees in Bostock v. Clayton County? Professor Eyer takes up these questions and many more as we find reasons both for concern and for hope. “Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies,” (2/18/25) “Interrogating the Historical Basis for a Unitary Executive,” Daniel D. Birke, Stanford Law Review (Jan. 2021) Professor Katie Eyer (Rutgers Law bio) Anti-Transgender Constitutional Law, 77 Vanderbilt L. Rev. __ (2024) (forthcoming) Transgender Constitutional Law, 171 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1405 (2023) Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 US ___ (2020) Check out the OA Linktree for all the places to go and things to do! To support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law!