Opening Arguments Trump Keeps Racking Up Ls in the Courts
17 snips
Dec 8, 2025 
Matt Cameron, a practicing attorney and regular legal analyst, joins to discuss recent court victories against the Trump administration's policies. They highlight how lower courts are pushing back on extreme executive actions, even facing challenges from the Supreme Court. Matt explains the impact of resignation waves at the DOJ and reviews several critical injunctions, including those protecting churches from ICE and blocking unlawful deportations. Their conversation also delves into voting remedies and the significance of restoring checks and accountability in governance.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Lower Courts Holding The Line
- Federal courts are generally resisting extreme executive overreach and preserving rule of law.
- Lower courts are performing key checks even when the Supreme Court can't address every issue.
DOJ Attrition Weakens Political Prosecutions
- Many politicized DOJ hires resigned, weakening the administration's ability to prosecute political enemies.
- Losing experienced attorneys undermines efforts to carry out legally competent campaigns against opponents.
Hagan Scott's Resignation Example
- Matt reads Hagan Scott's resignation line condemning misuse of prosecutorial power.
- The resignation became a notable example of DOJ attorneys refusing to participate.