The Daily Special Edition: A Guide to the Mueller Hearings
Jul 23, 2019
In this discussion, Michael Schmidt, a New York Times reporter known for his deep coverage of the Mueller investigation, breaks down the highly anticipated congressional testimony of Robert S. Mueller III. He dives into the strategic delays that shaped public perception, examines how questioning tactics could influence the narrative, and discusses the critical role of journalism in unveiling the truth. Schmidt also explores the expected Republican strategies and the potential ramifications for the 2020 election, emphasizing the complexities surrounding Mueller's findings.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Low Expectations for Testimony
- Public anticipation for Mueller's testimony is low due to several factors.
- These include Barr's prior statements, Mueller's limitations on discussion, and the report being already public.
Impact of Live Testimony
- Democrats hope Mueller's public testimony resonates more than the report itself.
- Hearing the special counsel discuss the report may impact public differently.
Delayed Subpoena
- Democrats delayed subpoenaing Mueller due to concerns about optics and his reluctance.
- Mueller's initial unwillingness further complicated their decision to compel his testimony.