HoP 451 - Could’ve, Would’ve, Should’ve - Free Will in the Second Scholastic
Sep 1, 2024
auto_awesome
Luis de Molina, a key figure in 17th-century philosophy, is spotlighted for his controversial doctrine of 'middle knowledge,' which addresses the tension between human free will and divine foreknowledge. The discussion reveals how Molina’s ideas challenged traditional views and sparked fierce debates among Catholic thinkers. The conflict between Molina and his Dominican counterpart, Báñez, highlights the theological rift over free will and grace, echoing through centuries of discussion on moral responsibility and agency.
Molina's doctrine of middle knowledge illustrates how divine foreknowledge can coexist with genuine human free will and moral responsibility.
The theological debate between Molina and Báñez highlights the tensions within Catholic doctrine regarding predestination and human autonomy.
Deep dives
Molina and the Concept of Middle Knowledge
Luís de Molina's concept of middle knowledge is a pivotal idea that addresses the relationship between divine foreknowledge and human free will. This theory suggest that God possesses knowledge of all possible outcomes based on human choices, rather than knowing what will unavoidably happen. For instance, in scenarios where an individual might be tempted to sin, God knows what they would choose under those specific circumstances without causing that choice or making it necessary. Thus, Molina argues that human actions retain their contingent nature, allowing for genuine moral responsibility, which is essential for justice in divine reward and punishment.
Free Will and Divine Intervention
Molina asserts that while God’s grace is necessary for individuals to choose rightly, it does not dictate the choices made by humans. He likens this divine cooperation to two people collaboratively pulling a heavy object, where God's grace provides assistance without overriding human autonomy. Despite acknowledging the mystery behind why some individuals face tougher temptations than others, Molina emphasizes that individuals still exercise their free will in making moral decisions. This balance preserves human agency while acknowledging the influence of divine grace in moral decision-making.
The Theological Controversy Between Molina and Báñez
The theological debate surrounding Molina's ideas, particularly with Domingo Báñez, illuminates significant tensions within Catholic doctrine regarding free will and divine foreknowledge. Báñez criticized Molina for supposedly implying that humans could influence God's knowledge, which he viewed as fundamentally flawed. The conflict escalated, leading to censure from the Portuguese Inquisition and the eventual involvement of Pope Clement VIII, who allowed for continued discussion but upheld a neutral stance. This unresolved dispute over free will and predestination reflects the complexity of reconciling divine omniscience with human freedom in Catholic theology.