The Daily Why the Supreme Court Might End Affirmative Action
23 snips
Nov 3, 2022 
Adam Liptak, Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times, dives into a pivotal case that could reshape affirmative action in universities. The discussion centers on the Supreme Court's consideration of race-conscious admissions at Harvard and UNC, highlighting claims of discrimination against Asian students. Liptak explores the ideological divide among justices and relates this case to historic rulings, emphasizing the broader societal implications of changing diversity policies in education. The stakes are high as the court deliberates the future of equal opportunity.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Affirmative Action and the 14th Amendment
- The Supreme Court's stance on affirmative action is rooted in the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
- Educational diversity has been considered a compelling enough interest to allow race as one factor among many in admissions.
The Purpose of Affirmative Action
- Affirmative action's goal isn't to correct past injustices but to improve the learning environment.
- Diverse student bodies supposedly create richer learning experiences for all.
The Case Against Affirmative Action
- Students for Fair Admissions argues the 14th Amendment prohibits racial classifications entirely.
- They claim considering race, even as one factor, is unconstitutional.