Within Reason #61 Sam Harris - Can Science Determine Moral Values?
87 snips
Mar 31, 2024 
In this engaging discussion, Sam Harris, a renowned neuroscientist and philosopher, dives into the complexities of morality. He examines whether science can objectively determine moral values, arguing against moral relativism and highlighting universal truths about suffering. The interplay between subjective experiences and objective ethics is explored, alongside the impact of cultural beliefs on moral frameworks. Harris also delves into the benefits of meditation and consciousness, challenging listeners to rethink the nature of personal and societal morality.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Stove Morality Challenge
- Sam Harris was challenged to prove objective morality using a kitchen stove on Twitter.
- This thought experiment highlights the immediate, undeniable nature of suffering.
Objective Badness
- Experiences like burning your hand on a stove are inherently bad, regardless of personal or cultural bias.
- This 'worst possible misery' argument suggests objective badness exists.
Worst Possible Misery
- Derek Gaubatz suggests 'worst possible misery' refers to suffering intensity, not moral judgment.
- Sam Harris clarifies it encompasses all aspects of badness.