ABA Journal: Legal Rebels
Tests into and out of law schools—what's changing and why
Aug 14, 2024
Join Kellye Testy, CEO of the Association of American Law Schools, and Julianne Hill from the ABA Journal in a dynamic discussion about the future of legal education. They dive into the competition the LSAT faces from the new JD-Next exam and the profound changes to bar exams by 2028. The duo emphasizes the importance of diversity and accessibility in admissions, explores innovative training methods, and addresses the role of technology in bridging the access to justice gap. It's a must-listen for anyone interested in the evolving landscape of law!
38:25
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The emergence of the JD-Next exam signifies a pivotal shift in diversifying law school admissions by incorporating holistic evaluations of candidates.
- As the bar exam undergoes transformation towards a competency-based approach, there are ongoing concerns about maintaining diversity and access in the legal profession.
Deep dives
The Evolution of Legal Admissions Testing
The LSAT was developed nearly 75 years ago to ensure fair access to legal education by evaluating fundamental skills without requiring specific content knowledge. The test has evolved over the years to maintain its integrity and predictability in assessing candidates' potential for success in law school. Recently, competition from alternative assessments like the JD Next exam has emerged, prompting discussions about how best to diversify admissions criteria while prioritizing equity and access. Efforts are underway to explore multiple pathways to law school, focusing on holistic evaluations that consider various aspects of a candidate's qualifications.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
