Decoder with Nilay Patel

Studying online bad behavior was hard. It's going to get harder in Trump 2.0

47 snips
Jan 6, 2025
Renee DiResta, an academic and researcher specializing in online abuse and disinformation at Georgetown, dives deep into the evolving landscape of online speech and moderation. She shares insights on the challenges researchers face, likening current threats to McCarthyism. The discussion uncovers the implications of diminished moderation on public discourse, particularly leading into the 2024 Election. DiResta also highlights how foreign interference and the rise of peer-to-peer misinformation complicate trust in online platforms amidst heated political dynamics.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
ANECDOTE

Personal Repercussions of Research

  • Renee DiResta's work has drawn harassment, threats, congressional investigations, and lawsuits.
  • One lawsuit is led by Stephen Miller, who will be a Trump advisor.
INSIGHT

Propaganda Campaign

  • DiResta believes the attacks are not truly about her work, but a propaganda campaign.
  • This campaign casts her as a villain to rally a political base.
ANECDOTE

Conspiracy Theory and Investigation

  • A conspiracy theory alleges DiResta's work at Stanford Internet Observatory was a government censorship operation.
  • This theory, based on misleading testimony, sparked investigations despite lacking evidence.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app