Sociolinguist Valerie Fridland and speech coach Rhonda Khan join the discussion on the frequent use of 'like' in modern language. They explore its historical roots, from 18th-century slang to contemporary usage, especially among young women. The conversation emphasizes the societal judgments tied to this seemingly trivial word and encourages embracing authentic communication styles. They also share tips for minimizing filler words without losing enthusiasm, promoting effective and personalized expression in both casual and professional settings.
The historical evolution of the word 'like' reflects its multifunctionality in communication, serving as a vital tool for expressing nuanced thoughts and emotions.
Perception biases regarding the use of 'like' highlight societal judgments that unfairly target specific groups, particularly younger speakers and women, impacting their self-confidence in language use.
Deep dives
The Evolution of 'Like'
The word 'like' has a rich historical context, dating back to the 13th century as a verb before evolving into various usages. Its function as a discourse marker emerged around the 16th century, indicating that its use is not merely a modern trend but part of a longstanding evolution in language. Linguists argue that 'like' serves numerous purposes in communication, such as providing emphasis, indicating subjectivity, and establishing narrative perspective. This multifunctionality points to its valuable role in expressing nuanced thoughts and emotions rather than being a sign of poor language skills.
Generational and Gender Differences in Usage
The use of 'like' tends to vary significantly across different generations and genders, with younger speakers, particularly women, often perceived as the primary users. While older studies suggest that women are more likely to use 'like', more recent analyses show that younger men also utilize it frequently, especially in specific contexts. The perception of 'like' as a marker of uncertainty or vacuity often unfairly highlights the use among young women, overshadowing its practical applications. This discrepancy in perception versus reality reveals societal biases that influence how language use is interpreted.
Cultural Perceptions and Misconceptions
'Like' often encounters criticism for being imprecise, with some viewing its frequent use as a marker of lower intelligence or ineffectiveness in communication. However, linguists argue that the frequency of 'like' does not equate to a lack of clarity or confidence; rather, it reflects a person's social identity and style. The backlash against 'like' may stem from societal tendencies to associate its use with younger speakers, particularly teenagers, who are experimenting with language during formative years. This misunderstanding can lead individuals, such as Allison, to feel self-conscious about their language, regardless of its functional role.
Strategies for Managing 'Like' in Speech
Those wishing to reduce the use of 'like' in their speech can adopt strategies that involve pausing for thought, a technique often encouraged by communication coaches. By incorporating intentional pauses, speakers can articulate their points more clearly while still maintaining the ability to express themselves authentically. Acknowledging that 'like' serves a purpose in casual conversations can also alleviate the pressure to eliminate it entirely, allowing speakers to feel more at ease. Overall, embracing individual communication styles while being aware of context is crucial for effective interaction, especially in professional settings.
Much to the chagrin of English teachers everywhere, people use the word “like”…a lot. Listener Allison calls the hotline to ask why we talk the way that we do and if she can change her own speech. Host Jonquilyn Hill gets answers from sociolinguist Valerie Fridland and speech coach Rhonda Khan.