Employee engagement surveys are often misguided, capturing only surface-level issues instead of the core challenges within organizations. The discussion reveals how these surveys can breed distrust and lead to false conclusions about workplace culture. Instead of traditional methods, a dynamic, conversational approach is advocated to genuinely understand employee sentiments. The speakers emphasize the importance of trust, collaboration, and directly engaging with employees to foster real improvement and meaningful change in workplace dynamics.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Employee engagement surveys often fail to capture the nuanced experiences of employees, leading to ineffective solutions that only address superficial symptoms.
Transforming employee engagement into a collaborative dialogue requires leaders to involve employees actively in problem-solving rather than taking a paternalistic approach.
Deep dives
The Flawed Nature of Employee Engagement Surveys
Employee engagement surveys are often poorly designed and executed, resulting in limited utility for organizations. These surveys typically generate a lot of hype and preparation, yet lead to feelings of anxiety among employees before the results are revealed. When results do come in, they are frequently viewed as a report card, but the subsequent actions taken to address issues are often lackluster and fail to create meaningful change. Ultimately, this cyclical process gives rise to a situation where problematic areas are identified but seldom effectively addressed, leading to recurring themes in employee feedback that go unmitigated.
The Misguided Focus on Averages
Using averages from engagement surveys fails to capture the full range of employee experiences within an organization. Results are typically reported as overall metrics, such as a general percentage of satisfaction, without consideration of the nuances behind those figures. This method overlooks significant outlier experiences, such as days of significant employee distress or thriving, reducing the value of insights gained. As a result, organizations may implement interventions that do not address the underlying issues, merely treating symptoms rather than the root causes.
The Importance of Meaningful Conversations
Relying solely on quantitative data from surveys neglects the importance of qualitative understanding through direct conversations with employees. Instead of treating survey results as definitive proof of issues requiring action, organizations should approach them as initial clues suggesting deeper conversations are needed. Engaging employees in focus groups or discussions can unveil critical context and insights that numerical data may obscure, leading to more actionable solutions that address the actual concerns employees face. This shift encourages a more collaborative and engaged environment where employees feel heard and valued.
Rethinking Leadership Dynamics and Engagement
Current practices surrounding engagement surveys often foster a paternalistic leadership dynamic, where employees feel they must turn to leaders for problem-solving without contributing to solutions themselves. This can create an unhealthy reliance on leaders to resolve issues that may stem from systemic problems within the organization. Moving away from this one-sided dynamic requires re-evaluating how leaders engage with survey data, focusing on shared responsibility for improvement. Collaborative problem-solving frameworks can empower employees to play an active role in addressing challenges, transforming engagement from a simple measure to a vibrant dialogue about continuous improvement.
No burying the lede this week: Employee engagement surveys are broken.
We expect them to tell us everything about a workplace’s culture—but they often miss the mark, capturing just a sliver of what's going on and usually only symptoms instead of underlying causes.
As leaders try to make sense of the data, there’s frequently a lot of smoke chasing, but nobody can tell where the fire is, or if there’s one at all. Add to that employee distrust around anonymity, spun-up initiatives to make changes that never go anywhere, and the fact that most surveys don’t even ask the right questions, and it’s no wonder everyone, from the C-suite to the frontline worker, suspects these surveys do more harm than good.
In this episode, Rodney and Sam explore what “engagement” actually means, what organizations should be measuring instead and why, and how to truly understand the health of your organization.
--------------------------------
Interesting in hearing more about the zones of the ocean? We've got stuff coming soon! Sign up here for first access: https://theready.ck.page/newvision
Want future of work insights and experiments you can try delivered to your inbox? Sign up here.
Follow us on your favorite platforms for more org design nerdery: