"Econ 102" with Noah Smith and Erik Torenberg

Immigration Debate w/ Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry and Noah Smith

58 snips
Dec 5, 2025
Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry, a noted writer and commentator on public policy, joins Noah Smith for a spirited debate on immigration. They delve into the moral and philosophical justifications of national borders, exploring the misconceptions held by voters about immigration's impact. Digging into enforcement strategies, Pascal questions progressive rhetoric while Noah suggests employer audits over mass deportations. The duo also discusses the intricate relationship between deportations, crime rates, and the fiscal toll on cities, leaving listeners with thought-provoking insights on a complex issue.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Borders Are Essential For Functioning States

  • Nations need borders and enforced rules to function and preserve democratic accountability.
  • Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry warns that devaluing borders risks undermining the nation-state as a working political form.
INSIGHT

Voter Views Shift With Better Information

  • Public opinion often opposes abstract open-borders theory but supports limiting enforcement extremes once informed.
  • Noah Smith argues many people hold inconsistent views because they lack facts on how policy operates in practice.
ANECDOTE

Parsley Massacre Cited As Extreme Example

  • Noah recounts the Dominican Republic's 1937 'parsley massacre' as an extreme historical response to immigration.
  • He uses it to illustrate how enforcement can become brutal, though he says the U.S. won't follow that path.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app