The Daily Is This How Roe Ends?
9 snips
May 4, 2022 
Adam Liptak, a Supreme Court reporter for The New York Times, dives into the implications of a leaked draft opinion that could overturn Roe v. Wade, sparking a political firestorm. He discusses how this ruling might shift abortion rights across the U.S. and what it means for marginalized communities facing restricted access. Liptak also examines the growing divide between red and blue states and the evolving role of the Supreme Court in shaping contentious legal precedents, raising concerns about the integrity of the judicial system.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Dobbs v. Jackson and Roe v. Wade
- The Supreme Court heard arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, which challenges Roe v. Wade.
- Five justices voted to overturn Roe, leading Justice Alito to draft the majority opinion.
Alito's Argument Against Roe
- Justice Alito argues the Constitution doesn't mention abortion, so states should decide its legality.
- He claims abortion lacks deep historical roots, as it was criminalized in most states when the 14th Amendment was adopted.
Overturning Precedent
- Alito justifies overturning Roe despite its 50-year precedent.
- He argues Roe's reasoning was weak and caused division, citing precedents overturned to expand rights.