Trump’s J6 Pardons, the Militia Movement, and the Border
Jan 30, 2025
auto_awesome
Amy Cooter, a researcher on domestic militias, Tess Owen, an investigative reporter on extremism, and Paul Rosenzweig, a cybersecurity lawyer, delve into President Trump’s pardons for January 6th insurrectionists. They discuss the alarming message these pardons send to violent militia groups like the Oath Keepers, the influence of social media on far-right extremism, and the potential legal ramifications of Trump's actions. Their insights illuminate the intersection of political violence, militia dynamics, and the risks posed by unchecked executive authority.
Trump's pardons for January 6 insurrectionists have raised significant legal concerns and implications for political violence in the U.S.
The varied responses among militia groups to the January 6 events highlight deep divisions and evolving ideologies within contemporary extremist factions.
Deep dives
Executive Actions and January 6 Pardons
President Trump has quickly implemented several executive orders since taking office, including issuing pardons to nearly 1,600 individuals connected to the January 6 insurrection. This includes prominent leaders of extremist groups like the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys, leading to significant concern among commentators and experts about the implications for political violence in the country. The response to these actions has varied among militia groups, with some expressing dismay at the events of January 6 while others support the pardons, complicating the conversation around these extremist factions. This scenario highlights not only the legal ramifications of these pardons but also the potential emboldenment of such groups as they interpret these decisions in light of their beliefs.
Militia Group Responses
Militia groups have shown a varied response to the events surrounding January 6, with some involved in the insurrection and others criticizing the approach taken by the perpetrators. Experts suggest that while some militia members may see the arrest and prosecution of January 6 participants as justified, others may perceive it as an attack on their movement, prompting a rallying response. This division among militia factions complicates the landscape of domestic militias in the wake of January 6, as they navigate their ideologies and the political climate. The ongoing evaluations by experts in extremism underscore the complexities of militias' roles in contemporary U.S. society and their future trajectories.
Legal Implications of Political Violence
The legal landscape surrounding the January 6 insurrection and Trump's subsequent pardons has sparked significant debate about the judicial system's approach to sentencing and prosecuting offenders. Experts indicate that most individuals convicted of minor crimes received lighter sentences, while those guilty of severe violence faced harsher repercussions, including lengthy prison terms. Contrary to Trump's narrative of excessive sentencing for January 6 participants, investigations show that the legal system has largely functioned as intended in assessing these cases based on their individual merits. This situation raises questions about the effectiveness of deterrence in curbing political violence and the potential long-term ramifications for judiciary actions moving forward.
The Role of Social Media and Organizing
Social media platforms have become critical spaces for extremist groups to organize and proliferate, especially following the deplatforming that occurred after January 6. Experts note that while some groups have returned to mainstream platforms like Facebook, others have adapted their tactics to use smaller or more private channels to evade scrutiny. This shift has enabled a resurgence of militia activity in various public spaces, as well as a mainstreaming of anti-government sentiment. The interplay between social media dynamics and extremism illustrates an evolving landscape where the narratives of groups are evolving, posing ongoing risks to public safety and cohesion.
President Trump’s executive action granting clemency to all of the January 6th insurrectionists – violent and non-violent alike – has been met with concern by legal experts and people who have been studying and reporting on militia groups like the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys for years. Kara speaks with Dr. Amy Cooter, director of research at the Center on Terrorism, Extremism, and Counterterrorism at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies and author of Nostalgia, Nationalism and the US Militia Movement; investigative reporter Tess Owen who has covered violent extremist groups, including the J6 protesters extensively; and Paul Rosenzweig, former Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy at the Department of Homeland Security under George W. Bush, who specializes in issues relating to domestic and homeland security about the message the pardons send to violent militias, the impact of social media (and Elon Musk) on far-right extremism, and whether Trump has the authority to deputize these groups, especially on the border.
Questions? Comments? Email us at on@voxmedia.com or find us on Instagram and TikTok @onwithkaraswisher
