We Want Them Infected Podcast

What Happens When Regulators Start Chasing Narratives

14 snips
Dec 14, 2025
Jonathan Howard and Wendy Orent explore the alarming shift in U.S. public health regulations, influenced more by narratives than scientific evidence. They dissect a controversial leaked memo about pediatric COVID vaccine deaths, revealing how ambiguity is being framed as proof of harm. Backlash from former FDA leaders highlights the misuse of data and transparency failures. The hosts also question the repercussions for well-established vaccines like hepatitis B amid rising distrust, arguing that this power play threatens public confidence and safety.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Dramatic Claims Threaten Regulatory Norms

  • Vinay Prasad's leaked memo claimed 10 pediatric COVID vaccine deaths and pushed for major regulatory changes.
  • Former FDA leaders warned his approach would upend scientific norms and erode public trust.
INSIGHT

Ambiguity Creates A Rorschach Test

  • Anonymous FDA staff said earlier reviews failed to attribute those pediatric deaths causally to the vaccine.
  • The hosts caution that ambiguous case reports become Rorschach tests that split public opinion.
INSIGHT

Performance Over Data Drives Narrative

  • Marty McCary asserted the Biden administration hid myocarditis data and vaccine-related child deaths.
  • Hosts argue those dramatic claims follow a pattern of performative drama rather than transparent data presentation.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app