Professor Hannah Skoda, a historian specializing in medieval studies, joins journalist Charlotte Hodgman to tackle the gruesome topic of medieval torture. They dive into why torture was employed and its legal standing, revealing surprising facts about its prevalence. The duo separates myths from facts about iconic torture devices, spotlighting a contemporary research project at the Tower of London. They also explore the psychological aspects of medieval trials, including Joan of Arc, and discuss how societal values shaped the evolution of torture leading up to the Reformation.
Torture in medieval England was never legally sanctioned and was rarely used, illustrating a cultural reluctance toward its application in law enforcement.
Contrary to popular belief, many infamous torture devices, like the Iron Maiden, were not commonly employed or even existed during the medieval period.
Deep dives
Legal Status of Torture in England
Torture was never legally sanctioned as a means of law enforcement in England, operating instead as an instrument of the state that could be authorized by the king. While the infamous case of Guy Fawkes exemplifies how torture was used under royal decree, it wasn't prevalent in English legal practice. In fact, instances of torture were rare, with many judges historically expressing reluctance to impose it, emphasizing a preference for legal principles over coercive tactics. This reluctance was particularly notable in cases where suspects were deemed to be standing mute, and judges often sought alternative means of obtaining pleas or evidence, indicating a cultural aversion towards torture.
Use of Torture for Serious Crimes
Torture, when employed, was primarily reserved for the most serious crimes, especially in cases where an individual refused to enter a plea. For instance, notorious highwayman Nathaniel Horse was subjected to torture, which ultimately coerced him into pleading guilty to avoid execution. The application of torture was closely linked to the severity of the crime, with particular emphasis on capital offenses and heretical beliefs during the Inquisition. This illustrates that not only were the crimes considered gravely serious, but the overarching legal and social frameworks deemed torture a last resort in seeking confessions.
Myths and Misconceptions About Medieval Torture
Many prevalent myths about medieval torture suggest it was both widespread and creatively horrific, but historical evidence indicates otherwise. Research shows that the reality of torture devices was far less imaginative than popular culture portrays, with many instruments often attributed to the medieval period actually being conceived later, such as the Iron Maiden. Furthermore, the notion that torture was common is misleading, as records reveal a strong societal discomfort with its use, evident in the lack of documentation and the cultural stigmas surrounding torture. Overall, the findings emphasize a nuanced understanding of medieval attitudes toward torture, which were much more complicated than often believed.
Why were people tortured in the Middle Ages? Was it ever legal? Did the infliction of physical pain play as large a role in medieval prosecutions as we might think? And did anyone actually experience the deadly embrace of the Iron Maiden? Speaking to Charlotte Hodgman, historian Professor Hannah Skoda answers a range of listener questions on torture in the medieval era.
The HistoryExtra podcast is produced by the team behind BBC History Magazine.