Dream Podcast - NFL Wild-Card THE PICKS !!

Jan 9, 2025

The hosts dive into intense NFL Wild-Card betting discussions, breaking down key matchups like Texans vs. Chargers. Steve Fezzik highlights the Texans' tough schedule, while Scott Seidenberg warns about their weak offensive line. In the Ravens vs. Steelers analysis, Mackenzie Rivers praises Baltimore’s playoff stats, citing Lamar Jackson’s dominance. The team also explores betting strategies across various games, from historical trends to player performance metrics, ensuring listeners are well-prepared for their wagers.

Ask episode

AI Snips

Chapters

Transcript

Episode notes

ADVICE

Free Best Bet

Claim a free best bet using code DREAM30 at pregame.com.
This offer includes picks from experts like Dave Essler and Steve Fezzik.

INSIGHT

Texans' True Form

The Texans' perceived downturn may not be as drastic as some believe.
Their performance against teams other than the Ravens suggests they are a solid division winner.

INSIGHT

Strength of Schedule Trend

Teams with significantly tougher schedules have performed well (32-12 ATS) in Wild-Card games.
This trend is even stronger with a 10+ game schedule disparity, like Texans vs. Chargers.

Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode

Get the app

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik, Scott Seidenberg and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL Wild-Card betting. The guys talk through each game and offer the best picks. Dave Essler also provides a best bet.

🏈 Key Game Analysis

Texans vs. Chargers

Steve Fezzik (3:28-6:41): Fezzik endorses Houston (+3), citing the strength of schedule trend (32-12 ATS for teams with significantly tougher schedules in Wild-Card games) and his power ratings favoring the Texans. He highlights the 15-spot schedule disparity (Houston: 14th, Chargers: 29th).
Scott Seidenberg (7:25-9:51): Seidenberg supports the Chargers, emphasizing Houston's weak offensive line (29th per PFF) and CJ Stroud's struggles against split-safety coverage (21st passer rating). The Chargers’ defensive scheme and top-4 efficiency against motion offenses are also noted.
RJ Bell (11:20-13:12): Bell debates Houston's perceived downturn but concludes Houston hasn't been atrocious, leaning toward the Texans based on line value.

Ravens vs. Steelers

Mackenzie Rivers (16:11-17:12): Rivers backs the Ravens (-9.5), emphasizing Baltimore’s league-best metrics and superior strength of schedule. Lamar Jackson's playoff dominance is noted.
Scott Seidenberg (19:04-21:11): Seidenberg highlights the Steelers' defensive decline (29th in EPA over the final three games) due to a diminished pass rush, advocating for the Ravens’ team total over 27.5.
Dave Essler (34:00-35:17): Essler favors Baltimore (-6 first half), citing a massive scoring disparity (+112 against playoff teams for Baltimore vs. -30 for Pittsburgh).
Betting Takeaways: The panel leans toward Baltimore's offensive success, with concerns about Pittsburgh's recent defensive struggles.

Broncos vs. Bills

Scott Seidenberg (42:09-44:17): Allen’s rushing prop (longest rush over 13.5 yards) is highlighted, with the Broncos’ blitzing tendencies creating opportunities for Allen to scramble effectively.
Steve Fezzik and RJ Bell (45:18-45:32): Discussion contrasts Allen’s rushing tendencies against dominant teams versus blowout scenarios, favoring over 41.5 total rushing yards.
Statistical Context: Buffalo’s balanced metrics place them as heavy favorites, but Denver's blitz rate and game script could lead to unexpected Allen rushing outcomes.

Packers vs. Eagles

RJ Bell (45:54-48:08): Bell emphasizes Green Bay’s defensive focus, favoring under 24.5 points for Philadelphia due to historical data showing teams losing consecutive games before playoffs clamp down defensively (12-3 ATS trend).
Scott Seidenberg (50:06-51:28): Seidenberg predicts a run-heavy game, backing Josh Jacobs over 16.5 rushing attempts. Green Bay’s reliance on its running game is noted, especially with Jordan Love’s elbow issue.
Steve Fezzik (53:12-53:28): Strength of schedule disparity (Packers: 6th, Eagles: 32nd) further supports betting value on Green Bay.

Rams vs. Vikings

RJ Bell (1:12:58-1:14:48): Bell highlights Minnesota’s overall consistency and coaching edge, favoring the Vikings despite red-zone struggles.
Mackenzie Rivers (1:15:07-1:15:19): Points out the Rams' lack of offensive production in recent games, scoring just 12, 19, and 13 points.
Betting Context: Minnesota’s reliability against weaker teams and the Rams’ challenges with injuries and a poor defensive showing (worst in playoffs) position the Vikings as favorites.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices