Dream Podcast - NFL Wild-Card THE PICKS !!
RJ Bell's Dream Preview
NFL Matchup Uncertainties: Vikings vs. Rams
This chapter explores the uncertainties surrounding the NFL matchups of the week, especially the impacts of wildfires on the Vikings versus Rams game. It analyzes team performances, playoff implications, and the challenges faced by the Rams as they prepare for crucial games.
00:00
Transcript
Play full episode
Transcript
Episode notes
RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik, Scott Seidenberg and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL Wild-Card betting. The guys talk through each game and offer the best picks. Dave Essler also provides a best bet.
🏈 Key Game Analysis
Texans vs. Chargers
- Steve Fezzik (3:28-6:41): Fezzik endorses Houston (+3), citing the strength of schedule trend (32-12 ATS for teams with significantly tougher schedules in Wild-Card games) and his power ratings favoring the Texans. He highlights the 15-spot schedule disparity (Houston: 14th, Chargers: 29th).
- Scott Seidenberg (7:25-9:51): Seidenberg supports the Chargers, emphasizing Houston's weak offensive line (29th per PFF) and CJ Stroud's struggles against split-safety coverage (21st passer rating). The Chargers’ defensive scheme and top-4 efficiency against motion offenses are also noted.
- RJ Bell (11:20-13:12): Bell debates Houston's perceived downturn but concludes Houston hasn't been atrocious, leaning toward the Texans based on line value.
Ravens vs. Steelers
- Mackenzie Rivers (16:11-17:12): Rivers backs the Ravens (-9.5), emphasizing Baltimore’s league-best metrics and superior strength of schedule. Lamar Jackson's playoff dominance is noted.
- Scott Seidenberg (19:04-21:11): Seidenberg highlights the Steelers' defensive decline (29th in EPA over the final three games) due to a diminished pass rush, advocating for the Ravens’ team total over 27.5.
- Dave Essler (34:00-35:17): Essler favors Baltimore (-6 first half), citing a massive scoring disparity (+112 against playoff teams for Baltimore vs. -30 for Pittsburgh).
- Betting Takeaways: The panel leans toward Baltimore's offensive success, with concerns about Pittsburgh's recent defensive struggles.
Broncos vs. Bills
- Scott Seidenberg (42:09-44:17): Allen’s rushing prop (longest rush over 13.5 yards) is highlighted, with the Broncos’ blitzing tendencies creating opportunities for Allen to scramble effectively.
- Steve Fezzik and RJ Bell (45:18-45:32): Discussion contrasts Allen’s rushing tendencies against dominant teams versus blowout scenarios, favoring over 41.5 total rushing yards.
- Statistical Context: Buffalo’s balanced metrics place them as heavy favorites, but Denver's blitz rate and game script could lead to unexpected Allen rushing outcomes.
Packers vs. Eagles
- RJ Bell (45:54-48:08): Bell emphasizes Green Bay’s defensive focus, favoring under 24.5 points for Philadelphia due to historical data showing teams losing consecutive games before playoffs clamp down defensively (12-3 ATS trend).
- Scott Seidenberg (50:06-51:28): Seidenberg predicts a run-heavy game, backing Josh Jacobs over 16.5 rushing attempts. Green Bay’s reliance on its running game is noted, especially with Jordan Love’s elbow issue.
- Steve Fezzik (53:12-53:28): Strength of schedule disparity (Packers: 6th, Eagles: 32nd) further supports betting value on Green Bay.
Rams vs. Vikings
- RJ Bell (1:12:58-1:14:48): Bell highlights Minnesota’s overall consistency and coaching edge, favoring the Vikings despite red-zone struggles.
- Mackenzie Rivers (1:15:07-1:15:19): Points out the Rams' lack of offensive production in recent games, scoring just 12, 19, and 13 points.
- Betting Context: Minnesota’s reliability against weaker teams and the Rams’ challenges with injuries and a poor defensive showing (worst in playoffs) position the Vikings as favorites.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
