Spotlight: The Birds & the Bees of Sports Science Research Papers. How Research is Conceived & Delivered

Apr 24, 2025

Explore the fascinating journey of scientific papers in sports research, from conception to publication. Discover insider tips on reading research critically and the importance of understanding the 'why' behind studies. Delve into the ethical obligations researchers face and the transparency required in scientific exploration. Hear about the bold ambitions of Nike to break the women's sub-4-minute mile and the complexities of marketing in sports. Lastly, enjoy humorous anecdotes about cycling mishaps and the dynamics of elite race strategies!

Ask episode

AI Snips

Chapters

Books

Transcript

Episode notes

ANECDOTE

Runners Rush Medical Questionnaires

Athletes often answer medical and health questionnaires too hastily or dishonestly to avoid further tests.
This impairs the quality of data collected and research utility.

INSIGHT

Durability Influences Sprint Outcome

Durability affects the ability to maintain sprint power at race end, changing race outcomes.
Evenapool's ability to sprint when fatigued overcame Van Aert's superior fresh sprint.

INSIGHT

Skepticism Over Nike's Breaking 4 Effort

Nike's attempt to break women's 4-minute mile involves comprehensive approaches beyond drafting.
There is skepticism about how much "mind science" and gear can improve already elite athletes' times.

Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode

Get the app

Join our Discourse Community

The Science of Sport is more than a podcast — it’s a growing community of curious, thoughtful people in sport and sports science. Join our Discourse by pledging on Patreon and tap into the deeper conversations.

Show Notes

Where do scientific papers come from?

In this week’s Spotlight, our main focus is a “birds and bees” conversation of the scientific world. Ross walks Gareth through how a research paper is conceived, conducted, and eventually delivered into the world through publication in scientific journals. We break down what is essential to how a paper fits into the larger sports science puzzle, and share some insider tips for reading research with a critical eye. We explore why the “why” behind a study matters more than most people think—and how every piece of research fits into a much bigger picture. Plus, we dive into the obligations and ethical requirements researchers face, and why transparency, study design, and disclosure are the foundations of real science.

But before we get to that deep dive, we tackle a mix of stories from the world of sport:

🏃‍♀️ A sub-4-minute mile for women?

There’s fresh talk of breaking the barrier—but Ross is sceptical. Is this genuine progress or just another gimmick? We explore what it would mean if it happened, and what will need to be thrown behind the world's best athlete to make it possible.

🚴‍♂️ Durability > sprint capacity?

From Remco’s win over Wout in Brabantse Pijl to takeaways from the Boston Marathon, we examine how this underrated concept—producing a fresh performance while fatigued deeper into a race—plays out in real-world results.

🎾 Doping rules, showers, and sample tampering.

A new controversy in tennis gets us talking about anti-doping protocols, and some of the wildest attempts in history to game the system

It’s science, scepticism, and sport—exactly how we like it.

Links

The two papers we discussed in our "Birds and Bees" section:

Greg Roe's Rugby paper: Spot the Difference
Nic Tam's Barefoot running paper: We don't all adapt like the story book said

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.