The Daily The President and the Census
Jul 11, 2019
In this engaging discussion, Adam Liptak, the Supreme Court reporter for The New York Times, unpacks the legal battles surrounding President Trump's push for a citizenship question on the 2020 census. He reveals the Supreme Court's ruling against the administration's motives, suggesting partisan advantages were at play. Liptak also addresses the confusion stemming from conflicting statements within the government. Ultimately, he explores the broader consequences for immigrant communities and the role of journalism in holding power accountable.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Unexpected Ruling
- The Supreme Court surprised many by ruling against the Trump administration's bid to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census.
- Documents from a deceased Republican strategist revealed a possible partisan motive behind the question.
A Door Left Ajar?
- Chief Justice Roberts suggested the Trump administration could offer a different reason for the question.
- He seemingly called out a cabinet official's dishonesty.
Chaos at the DOJ
- Following the ruling, the administration initially conceded defeat, only to reverse course after a presidential tweet.
- Confused Justice Department lawyers admitted to being unaware of the change in strategy.