Work has changed. Why haven't resumes? | Nicos Marcou
Oct 9, 2023
auto_awesome
HR leader Nicos Marcou discusses the limitations of resumes and proposes alternative methods for evaluating candidates. He highlights the lack of evidence supporting resumes, reliance on applicant tracking systems, and the subjective nature of preparation. Nicos advocates for inclusive workplaces to attract diverse talent and create welcoming environments.
Resumes fail to capture the true potential of individuals and contribute to discriminatory practices.
There are numerous alternatives to traditional resumes that offer a more comprehensive and equitable assessment of candidates.
Deep dives
Resumes fail to capture true potential
Resumes have been a mainstay in the job application process for decades, despite little evidence that they actually work. The reliance on resumes, both in manual reviews and automated scans, fails to capture the true potential and genius of individuals, as demonstrated by the example of Leonardo da Vinci, whose resume would not have hinted at his extraordinary talents. Resumes also contribute to discriminatory practices, as evidenced by the success rates of candidates who whiten their names or change them to those associated with the opposite gender.
Resumes are a flawed metric
Resumes are a flawed metric for assessing candidates, particularly those with non-traditional career paths and experienced candidates. The pressure to fit a lifetime of achievements onto one piece of paper is unrealistic and often leads to ageism or overlooking valuable skills. Additionally, the subjective nature of resume advice, such as page length, font selection, and inclusion of hobbies, adds to the confusion and conflicting information in creating an 'ideal' resume.
Exploring alternatives to resumes
There are numerous alternatives to traditional resumes that offer a more comprehensive and equitable assessment of candidates' skills and potential. Online skills assessments, portfolios of work, video testimonials, team problem-solving simulations, and gamified challenges are just a few examples of innovative methods that can better evaluate candidates and create a more inclusive workplace. Embracing these alternatives not only improves the talent pool, but also saves time and money by avoiding hiring the wrong person.
Resumes are a mainstay of the job application process -- despite little to no evidence that they actually help job-seekers or employers get what they want. So why are we still so preoccupied with them? HR leader Nicos Marcou dives into the absurdity of these one-page documents (or can they be two pages?) and offers different ways for companies to think about hiring qualified candidates.