The Alabama Ruling That Could Stop Families From Having Kids
Feb 26, 2024
auto_awesome
The podcast covers a surprising ruling in Alabama that halts fertility treatments, defining embryos as children. It explores the legal battle, personal stories, and emotional turmoil faced by individuals in the IVF community. The impact of the ruling on parenthood dreams and legislative responses in Alabama are discussed, along with updates on Donald Trump's primary win and NRA allegations.
Alabama Supreme Court ruled embryos as children under wrongful death statute, impacting IVF industry.
Ruling caused distress for IVF patients like Megan Cole, limiting options and raising emotional turmoil.
Deep dives
Alabama Supreme Court Rules on Embryo Lawsuit
The Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be considered children under the wrongful death statute, setting a precedent for the state. They argued that the embryos had the same legal rights as babies, impacting the entire IVF industry in Alabama. This ruling has caused uncertainty and panic among fertility clinics and patients, with several major clinics pausing IVF procedures.
Personal Impact on IVF Patients
The ruling affected individuals like Megan Cole, who was in the final stages of IVF treatment with a surrogate. The cancellation of the embryo transfer due to the ruling left her devastated, as her dream of having a child was put on hold. The uncertainty created by the ruling has limited options for patients like Megan to conceive a child in Alabama, leading to emotional turmoil and financial burdens.
Broader Implications and Political Responses
The ruling raised concerns about the future of IVF practices not only in Alabama but potentially nationwide. The tension between protecting IVF and aligning with anti-abortion sentiments highlighted a split in conservative views. Lawmakers in Alabama, including Governor Kay Ivey, considered legislation to safeguard IVF treatments from the ruling's consequences, but the timeline and support for such measures remain uncertain.
A surprise ruling from the Alabama Supreme Court has halted fertility treatments across the state and sent a shock wave through the world of reproductive health.
Azeen Ghorayshi, who covers sex, gender, and science for The Times, explains what the court case means for reproductive health and a patient in Alabama explains what it is like navigating the fallout.
Guests: Azeen Ghorayshi, who covers sex, gender and science for The New York Times; and Meghan S. Cole, who is in the final stages of IVF treatment in Alabama.
Fertility clinics are routinely sued by patients for errors that destroy embryos, as happened in Alabama.An effort to define them legally as “unborn children” has raised the stakes.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode