Richard Kahlenberg, author of 'Class Matters' and advocate for class-based affirmative action, dives into the complexities of diversity in elite universities. He argues that shifting from race-based to class-based policies better addresses socioeconomic disparities. The conversation touches on the historical context of affirmative action, the implications of recent Supreme Court rulings, and the controversial legacy admissions favoring affluent students. Kahlenberg emphasizes the need for a united working-class coalition to foster true diversity on campuses.
Richard Kahlenberg argues that class-based affirmative action can better achieve real diversity in elite universities compared to race-based policies.
The podcast critiques legacy admissions for perpetuating socioeconomic disparities, advocating for a shift towards admissions that prioritize economic disadvantage and genuine merit.
Deep dives
The Evolution of Affirmative Action
The discussion highlights the historical context of affirmative action in the United States, particularly the division among civil rights leaders regarding its implementation. While some advocated for racial preferences and quotas to address systemic injustices faced by Black individuals, others, like Martin Luther King Jr. and Bayard Rustin, argued for an economic approach that focused on class rather than race. This perspective emphasized that economically disadvantaged individuals, regardless of race, deserved support in overcoming their circumstances. The underlying intent was to foster unity among diverse working-class groups and address broader issues of inequality without deepening racial divides.
Merit vs. Circumstances in Admissions
The conversation raises important questions about the definition of merit in college admissions, challenging the notion that qualifications such as grades and test scores alone should determine acceptance. It is argued that merit must also account for the obstacles individuals have faced, particularly for students from underprivileged backgrounds. For instance, a student from a single-parent household attending under-resourced schools may have achieved commendable academic performance despite significant challenges, contrasting with a peer from an affluent background with access to resources. Evaluating potential through this lens is essential to understanding true merit and ensuring equitable opportunities.
Shifting Towards Class-Based Affirmative Action
The dialogue emphasizes the pressing need for a class-based approach to affirmative action following recent Supreme Court rulings that have questioned the legality of race-based preferences. Research suggests that class-based programs can offer significant benefits to underrepresented groups while maintaining diversity within educational institutions. Institutions like Harvard have begun implementing such programs, resulting in an increase in applicants from low-income and working-class backgrounds, which predominantly include Black and Hispanic individuals. This strategic shift illustrates the potential for creating more equitable opportunities while avoiding the pitfalls of racial preference systems.
Critique of Legacy Admissions
The discussion critiques the practice of legacy admissions and its implications for maintaining socioeconomic disparities within elite universities. Evidence suggests that legacy preferences disproportionately benefit students from wealthy backgrounds, often reinforcing existing inequalities within the educational landscape. There is a growing movement against legacy admissions, supported by civil rights groups that have begun addressing this issue more vocally in the wake of changes to affirmative action policies. As more schools reconsider their admissions criteria, there is hope for a more equitable approach that prioritizes genuine merit and economic disadvantage over inherited privilege.
For decades, America used a system of race-based affirmative action to ensure that disadvantaged minority groups had a presence at elite universities. Was that the right approach? Richard Kahlenberg joins the podcast to talk about his book 'Class Matters', and make the case that class-based affirmative action is a superior way to get real diversity on campus.