The Daily New Insights Into the Mueller Report
Apr 4, 2019
In this discussion, Nicholas Fandos, a Congressional reporter for The New York Times, and Michael S. Schmidt, who covered the Mueller investigation, dive into the complexities of the Mueller report. They reveal tensions between special counsel Robert Mueller and Attorney General William Barr, particularly regarding obstruction findings that many believe were misrepresented. The talk also highlights the challenges of investigating a sitting president, and the House Judiciary Committee's push for the full report, stressing the need for transparency in political processes.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Barr's Decision
- Barr made the unusual decision to determine the obstruction of justice issue.
- Mueller, unusually, did not make a determination, leaving Barr open to criticism.
Political Implications
- Mueller's refusal to determine the obstruction issue leaves room for political interpretations.
- Barr, a political appointee, making the decision raises concerns about potential bias.
Barr's View on Executive Power
- Barr's expansive view of executive power influenced his decision on obstruction.
- His pre-appointment memo argued some presidential acts shouldn't be considered obstruction.