163: eLife's new peer review model

1

Introduction

00:00 • 4min

2

The Editor Says No to Everything That Gets Reviewed

04:29 • 5min

3

Is This Really Important?

09:55 • 3min

4

The Biggest Transformation Is Putting Power Back in the Authors

13:09 • 2min

5

Can a Bad Public Review Sink My Career?

15:37 • 5min

6

Is Narcissism a Fucking Ripper?

20:28 • 2min

7

Do You See Yourself Going Back in the Universe?

22:29 • 3min

8

Is eLife an Accepted Paper?

25:50 • 5min

9

XYZ Labs

30:43 • 2min

10

Is This a Rash of Other Journals Taking Up That Less Radical Policy?

32:35 • 2min

11

Is Post-Publication Peer Review Important?

34:54 • 2min

12

Is It Going to Be Society Journals?

37:20 • 2min

13

How to Reduce Research Waste

39:41 • 2min

14

How Do You Know if You Can't Build Your Own Nature?

41:50 • 3min

15

Why Isn't It Time to Change the Journals?

44:35 • 2min

16

I Don't Think It'll Make a Difference, Daniel.

47:00 • 2min

17

Apc

49:26 • 2min

18

Is It Less Work?

51:11 • 4min