Susan Sontag, an influential figure in art, criticism, and the avant-garde, discusses her essay 'Against Interpretation'. The episode explores interpretation in art, criticism, and politics, examining Sontag's views on cinema and the overproduction of experiences. It highlights the impact of political system forms on outcomes, the significance of understanding the artist's intention, and Sontag's obsession with courage and the erotics of art.
Susan Sontag argues against interpretation in art and politics, urging a focus on the experience and form of the subject rather than hidden meanings.
Sontag's essay prompts us to consider the importance of understanding politics through its forms and experiences, rather than solely focusing on underlying meanings.
Deep dives
The Dangers of Over-Interpretation in Art and Politics
Susan Sontag's essay, Against Interpretation, argues that there is too much focus on finding hidden meaning and interpreting works of art and politics. She suggests that this obsession with interpretation neglects the experience and form of the thing itself. By constantly searching for deeper truths, individuals miss the surface-level impact and change that can occur. Sontag criticizes over-intellectualization and theorizing in both art and politics, advocating for a focus on the actual experience and form to better understand and appreciate their significance. She also praises cinema for its direct and rapid ability to engage viewers without allowing excessive interpretation. Overall, the essay serves as a cautionary reminder to resist over-interpreting and to appreciate the power of direct experience in both art and politics.
The Changing Forms of Politics
Sontag's essay challenges the prevailing notion that politics should be focused on deep meaning and hidden motives. She argues that more attention should be given to the form and experience of politics rather than constantly searching for hidden meanings. This is particularly relevant in today's world, where political experience is rapidly evolving due to new forms of communication and information technology. By neglecting the focus on form and experience, commentators risk missing the essential changes and possibilities in contemporary politics. Sontag's essay prompts us to consider the importance of understanding politics through its forms and how they are experienced, rather than solely focusing on underlying meanings.
The Avant-Garde in Politics
While Sontag's essay primarily addresses the art world, it can be applied to politics as well. In particular, it raises the idea that Donald Trump's unique style of political communication may be seen as an avant-garde form of politics. Sontag emphasizes the importance of form over content, and Trump's unconventional and free-associative stream of consciousness style certainly aligns with this notion. While his words may lack substance and deep meaning, they have had a significant impact on the political landscape, changing the possibilities and norms of democratic politics. This prompts us to consider how form and experience can be as influential as hidden meanings in shaping political outcomes.
The Limits of Interpretation in Politics and Art
Sontag's essay reminds us of the potential dangers of excessive interpretation in both politics and art. She argues that constantly seeking hidden meanings can lead to over-intellectualization and a failure to appreciate the immediate experience and form of the subject. Sontag advocates for a more direct and visceral engagement with politics and art, one that goes beyond searching for deeper truths. This idea challenges the prevailing intellectual culture that often prioritizes interpretation and theorizing. By recognizing the limitations of interpretation, we can gain a fuller understanding and appreciation of the impact and significance of both politics and art.
This episode in our history of the great essays and great essayists is about Susan Sontag’s ‘Against Interpretation’ (1963). What was interpretation and why was Sontag so against it? David explores how an argument about art, criticism and the avant-garde can be applied to contemporary politics and can even explain the monstrous appeal of Donald Trump.
‘The upside of Sontag’s downside was that her ire was generated by the same power supply that electrified her battle for principles that others only espoused.’
‘Paris let her say no to an academic life, but not to a life of ideas. The best thinking was done in cafes, or in bed, or at the movies, not in libraries.’