Are Babies Racist? Is Empathy Bad for Society? And More with Dr. Paul Bloom
Jan 11, 2024
auto_awesome
Dr. Paul Bloom, a psychologist and expert in evolutionary psychology, discusses the biases programmed by evolution and condemns empathy. The podcast explores babies' social understanding and biases, challenges the conventional definition of empathy, prioritizes impact through warm glow altruism, and emphasizes the need to overcome emotional biases.
Empathy, although often seen as a positive trait, can be biased, shortsighted, and lead to misguided decision-making and policies.
Empathy-driven decision-making can be easily manipulated for divisive purposes and can result in misplaced priorities.
Deep dives
The Downsides of Empathy
In this podcast episode, Dr. Paul Bloom discusses the downsides of empathy as a moral guide. He argues that empathy, which involves feeling the pain or emotions of others, is biased, shortsighted, and often leads to misguided decision-making and policies. Bloom emphasizes that while empathy can be beneficial in personal relationships and certain contexts, it can hinder our ability to make rational and effective choices for the greater good. He suggests cultivating compassion, which involves caring for others without necessarily experiencing their emotions, as a more rational and productive approach to moral decision-making.
The Bias of Empathy
Bloom highlights the natural biases of empathy, such as favoring those who are attractive or similar to ourselves, and how these biases can lead to unfair and arbitrary treatment of others. He presents various studies that demonstrate how empathy can be influenced by conscious and subconscious biases, including racial and language biases. Bloom also emphasizes that empathy can be easily manipulated for divisive purposes, as people's empathetic responses can be swayed by specific narratives or emotional appeals.
The Impact on Public Policies
Bloom provides examples of how empathy-driven decision-making can have negative consequences for public policies. He cites the case of the Willie Horton incident in a presidential election campaign, where empathy-driven reactions led to the shutdown of a beneficial furlough program. Bloom also discusses how empathy can lead to misplaced priorities, as people are more likely to focus on high-profile, emotionally charged incidents like school shootings, while neglecting more statistically significant issues, such as climate change or public health.
The Path Forward
Bloom suggests that individuals can combat the negative influence of empathy by cultivating awareness of their biases and making deliberately rational, compassionate choices. He encourages people to consider the long-term effects, statistical data, and potential biases behind their empathetic responses. Bloom concludes that by recognizing the limitations of empathy and bolstering our rational decision-making processes, we can make more informed and effective choices that truly benefit others.
In this episode we start with a dive into evolutionary psychology and how biases have been programmed into you by millions of years of evolution, look at why our guest condemns the concept of Empathy, how the science demonstrates that empathy has no correlation with doing good in the world, how empathy creates disastrous outcomes, and more with our guest Dr. Paul Bloom