
The Daily A Public Hearing, and a Feud Over Ukraine
Nov 14, 2019
Michael S. Schmidt, a national security and federal investigations reporter for The New York Times, provides insider analysis on a historic impeachment hearing. He discusses the tense climate as William B. Taylor Jr. and George P. Kent reveal the complexities of U.S. foreign policy toward Ukraine. The conversation delves into the implications of tying military aid to political investigations and highlights the fierce partisan divides in Congress. Listeners will gain insight into how this inquiry could influence the 2020 election and reshape presidential accountability.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Opening Statements
- Rep. Adam Schiff opened the impeachment hearing, arguing that Trump exploited Ukraine's vulnerability.
- He emphasized the importance of military aid to Ukraine amidst Russian aggression.
Republican Counterarguments
- Rep. Devin Nunes countered that the impeachment inquiry was a "low-rent Ukrainian sequel" to the "Russia hoax".
- He framed the witnesses, George Kent and Bill Taylor, as Democratic recruits.
Witness Credibility
- Witnesses Kent and Taylor presented themselves as nonpartisan career diplomats.
- They emphasized their long service under both Republican and Democratic presidents.

