ZOE Science & Nutrition cover image

Recap: Is snacking really that bad? | Prof Tim Spector and Prof Sarah Berry

ZOE Science & Nutrition

NOTE

Examining the Myths of Snacking and Intermittent Fasting

Intermittent fasting and snacking myths are nuanced, highlighting misconceptions about energy levels and meal timing. Research indicates that individuals can maintain energy and performance, such as during workouts, without pre-exercise meals, contradicting widespread beliefs fueled by marketing. Additionally, concerns about snacking and weight gain are not as straightforward as assumed. Population studies may suggest that increased snacking correlates with higher caloric intake, but controlled clinical trials do not support this, indicating that timing and frequency of meals can affect hunger and subsequent food intake. Eating smaller, more frequent meals may lead to lower hunger levels and lesser consumption at subsequent meals compared to consuming a single large meal. This suggests that individual dietary approaches should be personalized rather than generalized.

00:00
Transcript
Play full episode

Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts

Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
App store bannerPlay store banner