AI companies initially showed unhappiness and resistance towards the regulation oversight, with companies like OpenAI, Microsoft, and Google lobbying the EU to self-regulate and expressing dissatisfaction at the assumption of their products being automatically bad. Some members of the EU also expressed discontent, emphasizing the need to provide room for homegrown AI companies to innovate. This dissent led to prolonged debates and disagreements within the EU about the scope and details of the regulatory agreement, despite the originally proposed timeline of two years.
The EU has advanced first-of-its-kind AI regulation. The Verge’s Jess Weatherbed tells us whether it will make a difference, and Columbia University’s Anu Bradford explains the Brussels effect.
This episode was produced by Amanda Lewellyn, edited by Matt Collette, fact-checked by Laura Bullard, engineered by Patrick Boyd, and hosted by Sean Rameswaram.
Transcript at vox.com/todayexplained
Support Today, Explained by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices