AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Intense Cross-Examination and Credibility Challenges
During the trial, there was intense cross-examination where Daniels stood her ground against aggressive questioning from the defense. Despite attempts to undermine her credibility by pointing out supposed disparities in her interviews, Daniels' central story about having sex with Trump remained consistent over the years, lacking significant details that would raise doubts. The defense strategy aimed to discredit Daniels by questioning details she provided and attempting to sow seeds of doubt. However, the judge's reaction to repeated calls for a mistrial suggested a lack of substantial grounds for discrediting Daniels' testimony.