Join Jonah Bromwich, a criminal justice reporter for The New York Times, as he provides an insider's perspective on Stormy Daniels' gripping eight-hour testimony against Donald Trump. Discover how her background as a porn star influenced courtroom perceptions and the dramatic exchanges during her cross-examination. Bromwich unpacks the defense's tactics aimed at undermining her credibility, revealing the intense legal maneuvering at play. Plus, hear about the implications of hush money payments and how this high-stakes case is impacting American political discourse.
Stormy Daniels' testimony aimed to establish credibility and reveal the significance of concealing the sex scandal.
Defense tactics focused on impeaching Daniels' credibility by questioning her past statements and motives.
Deep dives
Stormy Daniels Testifies in Trump Trial
During the trial of Donald J. Trump, Stormy Daniels, a former porn star, took the stand and testified about an encounter in 2006 where she had sex with Trump. The prosecution strategically called her to emphasize the cover-up of a hush money payment aimed at concealing the sex scandal. Daniels' nervous demeanor during testimony and vivid details of the encounter aimed to establish credibility and show the significance of hiding such information.
Defense Challenges Stormy Daniels' Credibility
In response to Daniels' testimony, the defense focused on impeaching her credibility by portraying her as a dishonest and vengeful character. Through intense cross-examination, the defense attorney questioned Daniels' past statements and motives, aiming to undermine her reliability as a witness. Although some tactics, like highlighting a revenge-driven tweet, appeared effective, Daniels' assertive responses and consistency in key details countered attempts to discredit her.
Trial Dynamics and Judge's Rulings
The trial showcased contrasting strategies as the prosecution aimed to leverage Stormy Daniels' testimony to strengthen their case against Trump, while the defense sought to erode her credibility through impeachment tactics. The judge's reluctance to declare a mistrial reflected a belief in Daniels' narrative credibility and emphasized the importance of cross-examination as a remedy. Despite tensions and contentious moments, Daniels' testimony ultimately contributed to aligning a sequence of events in the prosecution's narrative leading up to the trial's next significant witness, Michael Cohen.
Here are six takeaways from Ms. Daniels’s earlier testimony.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode