The motive behind using specific language in lawsuits is to argue for personhood by defining life at its earliest stages, a strategy different from traditional fertility clinic cases that often settle for damages. While the plaintiffs have not disclosed their motivations, their choice of language aligns with the personhood movement's goal of overturning abortion rights. This shift in strategy raises questions about the potential impact on IVF practices following the fall of the Roe v. Wade ruling in 2022.
A surprise ruling from the Alabama Supreme Court has halted fertility treatments across the state and sent a shock wave through the world of reproductive health.
Azeen Ghorayshi, who covers sex, gender, and science for The Times, explains what the court case means for reproductive health and a patient in Alabama explains what it is like navigating the fallout.
Guests: Azeen Ghorayshi, who covers sex, gender and science for The New York Times; and Meghan S. Cole, who is in the final stages of IVF treatment in Alabama.
Background reading:
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.