Radius of Reason

Was 2024 the year of the metacrisis? From rising temperatures (climate change), continued unleashing of artificial intelligence onto global markets, and an increasingly complex geopolitical reality, things seems to have escalated the interwoven complexities constituting the so called metacrisis. Andrey and Levon sit down to take stock of these events, and place a pin on where humanity is on the ‘how screwed are we’ spectrum.

The second Donald Trump presidency will be responsible for addressing some of the most complex foreign policy challenges faced by the United States in the 21st century. The War in Ukraine, Israel’s increasingly complex war with Palestine, instability in the Red Sea, and persistent tensions between the United States and China all run the risk devolving into yet another existential threat to humanity. Dr. Mark Kukis joins the show to offer his predictions for what a second Trump foreign policy will look like. Leveraging decades of experience as an academic, foreign policy commentator, and journalist on the frontlines of the Global War on Terror, Dr. Kukis delves into his greatest concerns for global stability as the second Trump administration gears up to again lead American foreign policy and offers his perspective on what can be done to resolve continuous global collective action problems. GUEST INFO: Dr. Mark Kukis https://x.com/markkukis https://www.minerva.edu/people/mark-kukis-ph-d/ Articles by Dr. Kukis: https://aeon.co/users/user-zd39pvswk5r1sq Books by Dr. Kukis: https://tinyurl.com/b5uy9n6e

Jeff Bezos and other billionaires are fixated on grand visions for humanity, from building space colonies to terraforming Mars. Yet their businesses contribute heavily to the environmental and social crisis (or more generally, the metacrisis) they seem determined to leave behind. We explore why their off-world ambitions sidestep urgent issues like climate change, how their "philanthropy" is more control in disguise, and the dangers posed by their media influence. Could the dominance of billionaires in media—like Bezos’ ownership of The Washington Post, which has been criticized for avoiding the endorsement of Kamala Harris because it could disrupt his relationship with Donald Trump—be steering the United States toward a plutocracy?

Are hunter-gatherers happier than people in modern society? Has all of our material progress led to a genuine improvement in well-being, or is something amiss? These questions lie at the core of the meaning crisis, and more broadly, the metacrisis—a series of interrelated challenges facing civilization today. Evolutionary anthropologist Dr. Vivek Venkataraman joins us to examine the lives of both prehistoric and contemporary hunter-gatherers, shedding light on the trade-offs that accompanied humanity's transition to larger and more complex societies. Drawing from his extensive experience living with and studying the Batek people of Malaysia—a modern hunter-gatherer community—Dr. Venkataraman helps us explore the contrasts in work-life balance, social relationships, mating dynamics, cultural values, and collective decision-making between their way of life and modern civilization. The discussion ultimately probes whether the course of human history was inevitable, shaped by game-theory dynamics/incentives, and considers what lessons we might learn from hunter-gatherer societies to address the challenges of our present and future. GUEST INFO: Dr. Vivek Venkataraman https://www.vivekvenkataraman.com/ https://x.com/vivek_vasi?lang=en

Can capitalism evolve to help address the metacrisis? This video explores the transformative potential of regenerative economics within a capitalistic framework. Drawing on the work of thinkers like Daniel Schmachtenberger, regenerative designer Ernesto Van Peborgh helps us understand what needs to change to create a more sustainable and regenerative system. We discuss the principles and practical steps that could guide us toward an economy that restores balance, mitigates ecological damage, and aligns with the broader efforts to confront the metacrisis.

Is the metacrisis overblown? In this episode, we debate whether we’re truly facing a global web of urgent, interconnected catastrophic and existential risks, or if the metacrisis framework—popularized by Daniel Schmachtenberger and Nate Hagens—overstates the problem. We cover a range of topics including systems thinking, the effectiveness of holistic versus reductionist approaches to solving complex issues, and whether economic growth is worth the cost of its negative externalities. We also discuss whether the metacrisis concept is too vague to offer clear, actionable solutions for humanity's most pressing challenges.

The journey towards addressing the metacrisis begins with what Daniel Schmachtenberger describes as a "cultural enlightenment." This involves spreading awareness and understanding of the metacrisis framework, which emphasizes holistic, systems-level thinking. But how do we translate such a complex concept into a movement that resonates with the broader populace? Can we create a community that not only educates but also fosters the right conditions for meaningful thought and action? And most importantly, can we distill these ideas into a message that’s accessible to all?

Do sociopaths bear any responsibility for the metacrisis? It’s no secret that sociopathic tendencies are driving factors for success in our current socioeconomic model: assertiveness, charisma, and risk-taking behaviors are qualities that contribute to success in work and politics, and are at times even elevated by our society as virtues for effective leadership. The likes of Steve Jobs and Napoleon Bonaparte are revered for their leadership, despite demonstrating behaviors that would otherwise fall on the sociopathic spectrum. The behavior patterns of these sorts of individuals almost certainly contribute to the interconnected problems faced by humanity today, and any steps to resolving this metacrisis will likely require checks on systems captured by sociopaths.GUEST INFO: Chusna Prasertkul https://chusana.substack.com/Credits: Intro music: https://pixabay.com/users/gregorquendel-19912121/

To solve the metacrisis, we need what Daniel Schmachtenberger calls a "third attractor". In part 1, we looked at creating a model for a third attractor system at the international level - "The Meta Treaty". In this episode, we discuss the next stage of implementing the Meta Treaty Model – the ‘one world government’ – as a means of bringing about collective global action to address the compounding existential threats faced by humanity. We explore the feasibility of implementing this third attractor system and what sorts of grassroots movement would be needed to move our population from one of disenfranchised apathy to action in support of humanity.

To solve the metacrisis, we need what Daniel Schmachtenberger calls a "third attractor". What would such a system look like in practice? Could we construct a "third attractor"-esque system at the international level, or is any sort of world government doomed to become a dystopian nightmare? In this episode, Levon and Andrey are joined by Alex – a rationalist, effective altruist, and founder of The Guild of the Rose – to discuss this potential (partial) solution to the metacrisis -- the web of interconnected catastrophic risks faced by humanity (such as climate change, AI, bio weapons, and nuclear war).