Domenico Montanaro, an insightful NPR political analyst, breaks down the summer's whirlwind in U.S. politics. He discusses Donald Trump's unexpected resurgence amid legal trials and a dramatic assassination attempt at a rally that paradoxically boosts his standing. The conversation shifts to President Biden's struggle with re-election viability and his surprising withdrawal, paving the way for Kamala Harris's rising influence. With campaigns heating up, they analyze the critical issues driving voter sentiment as the election nears.

For this episode of Trump's Trials, All Things Considered Host Ailsa Chang speaks with Justice Correspondent Carrie Johnson.The Justice Department has obtained a new grand jury indictment in the federal election interference case against Donald Trump. The move comes weeks after the Supreme Court gave the former president substantial immunity from prosecution.Follow the show on Apple Podcasts or Spotify for new episodes each Saturday.Sign up for sponsor-free episodes and support NPR's political journalism at plus.npr.org/trumpstrials.Email the show at trumpstrials@npr.org.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

Constitutional expert Kim Wehle discusses the dismissal of Trump's classified documents case, the unconstitutionality of Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment, the appeal filed by Smith, and the potential Supreme Court involvement. They analyze Judge Cannon's ruling, implications for the case, evolution of special counsels, concerns about unchecked presidential power, and the integrity of the judicial system.

NPR journalists Greg Allen and Carrie Johnson discuss Federal Judge Cannon dismissing Trump's classified documents case, citing unconstitutional appointment of Special Counsel. Analysis includes reactions from Trump, status of other cases, and implications on Justice Department. Explore the strong case against Trump in Florida, potential delays, and coverage of the Republican National Convention by NPR Politics Podcast.

For this episode of Trump's Trials, host Scott Detrow speaks with Daniel Ziblatt and Steven Levitsky, the authors of How Democracies Die and Tyranny of the Minority.The Supreme Court's landmark decision ruling that president's enjoy broad immunity from criminal prosecution stunned many constitutional experts. Ziblatt and Levitsky see it as the latest move that has put America's democracy in danger of "collapse." In this episode we dive into the state of America's democracy and what can be done to save it. Follow the show on Apple Podcasts or Spotify for new episodes each Saturday.Sign up for sponsor-free episodes and support NPR's political journalism at plus.npr.org/trumpstrials.Email the show at trumpstrials@npr.org.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

Former deputy assistant attorney general Harry Litman joins the show to discuss the Supreme Court's immunity ruling complicating legal cases against Trump. Topics include reactions to the decision and its impact on Trump's ongoing legal battles.

NPR Justice Correspondent Carrie Johnson discusses what would have happened if today's Supreme Court ruled on Nixon's case. The impact of the immunity ruling on Trump and Nixon is analyzed, sparking concerns about presidential accountability. The fallout from the decision on Trump's sentencing delay is explored, along with his maneuvering post-ruling.

Law professor Kim Wahle and NPR editor Domenico Montanaro discuss the Supreme Court ruling granting Trump immunity for 'core' acts as president. They explore the impact on election interference cases, presidential immunity definition, and implications for future presidents and legal proceedings.

NPR's Justice Correspondent, Carrie Johnson, discusses the Supreme Court's ruling on January 6th rioters, impacting Trump's federal election interference case. The charge of obstructing an official proceeding requires proof of document interference, affecting over 350 cases and potential charges against Trump.

Retired federal judge Shira Scheindlin criticizes Judge Aileen Cannon's handling of the classified documents case involving Trump. Discussion on delays in rulings, bias towards defense, and tactics to delay trial. Analysis of Trump's confrontational behavior with justice system and challenges faced by judiciary. Concerns about Judge Cannon's decisions and ties to Federalist Society. Overall, a fascinating discussion on legal intricacies and judicial processes.