Trump's Terms

Majorities say the state of the union is not strong, that the country is headed in the wrong direction and President Trump is rushing to make changes without considering their impact, a new NPR/PBS News/Marist poll finds.Support NPR and hear every episode sponsor-free with NPR+. Sign up at plus.npr.org.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

A critical pause on $2 billion in foreign aid could jeopardize Food for Peace, the U.S.'s key international food assistance program. The impact of USAID's food assistance reaches far beyond borders, significantly supporting American farmers and fostering global stability. Concerns loom over how the potential dismantling of these programs could affect agriculture and food aid management. The conversation also touches on broader political themes, revealing personal anecdotes that add humor and relatability to the discussion.

Explore the intriguing question of whether the president can spend less than Congress directed through the concept of impoundment. Dive into historical examples from major presidencies like Jefferson and Nixon to understand the evolving power dynamics. The discussion highlights how these legal frameworks affect executive authority, particularly during Trump's administration. The episode wraps up with insights into the importance of public media and recommendations for related political content.

The discussion highlights the impact of the White House's initiatives against Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the military. It reveals challenges in recruiting women and people of color, along with a troubling shift in military public image. The conversation also addresses the isolation experienced by service members, particularly among racial minorities. Insights from a veteran organization leader shed light on the disconnect between unity initiatives and real experiences, hinting at potential shifts under current administration policies.

Dive into the tangled relationship between Republicans and the Education Department. Explore the tension surrounding President Trump's desire to dismantle the department, highlighting its limited power over local schools. Unearth the conflicting views on educational policies, particularly regarding marginalized groups like disabled and transgender students. Finally, wrap it up with insights on how these debates reflect broader social issues, while also touching on the importance of community and connection in today's world.

A new federal directive is causing waves among employees, demanding weekly accomplishment reports or facing dismissal. Confusion reigns as some bosses advise caution before responding, igniting debates over the legality and implications for workers' rights. Legal experts weigh in on the interpretation of this controversial mandate, questioning its impact on the federal workforce.

The podcast dives into the intriguing overlap between Elon Musk's business ambitions and his role in government. Experts voice concerns about potential conflicts of interest as he navigates dual roles. The discussion highlights how his influence impacts federal spending and key international projects. Ethical dilemmas arise, questioning whether public service takes precedence over personal gain. This exploration raises significant implications for government ethics in today's political landscape.

A recent executive order has ignited discussions on presidential power over independent regulatory agencies. It raises questions about the autonomy of entities like the SEC and CPSC. The implications of requiring White House approval for regulations, especially in areas like cryptocurrency, pose ethical and legal challenges. As the White House influences these agencies more, the balance of power and integrity of oversight comes into focus. What does this mean for the future of regulation and governance?

A major crisis unfolds as the Trump administration sidelines Europe in crucial negotiations on the Ukraine war. Experts express that this has become Europe's worst nightmare, pointing to deepening geopolitical rifts. European leaders rush to an emergency meeting to address their mounting security concerns and to reclaim their vital role in the dialogue. Tensions also rise with a contentious call between an American figure and the Russian President, reflecting the precarious balance in international relations.

The episode dives into significant personnel changes within the DOJ that affected the January 6th investigations. It spotlights Emil Bove, whose past involvement adds layers of intrigue and raises questions about potential biases. Critics voice concerns over the motives behind these shifts, suggesting retaliation may be at play. Additionally, insights from a U.S. Attorney's Office co-chief highlight the collaborative efforts with the FBI, emphasizing a dedication to justice in navigating these complex cases.