LawDroid Manifesto Podcast

In Episode 15 of LawDroid Manifesto, I speak with Dennis Kennedy, Director of the Center for Law Technology and Innovation at Michigan State University College of Law and recipient of the American Legal Technology Award for lifetime achievement. Dennis shares his journey from recognizing the internet's revolutionary potential in 1995 to his current work with AI, offering invaluable insights about navigating technological disruption in legal practice. He challenges lawyers to engage with AI rather than resist it, drawing powerful parallels between today's AI revolution and the early internet era. For more conversations with legal innovators who are reshaping the profession, visit www.lawdroidmanifesto.com where subscribers get exclusive content, early access to episodes, and opportunities to engage directly with our guests. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.lawdroidmanifesto.com/subscribe

The world feels off its axis. Authoritarian impulses, once relegated to distant corners of history, now threaten the institutions we cherish. Democracy falters in places we long considered impregnable, international alliances shatter under the weight of protectionism, and a climate of fear turns neighbor against neighbor. Even the most steadfast champions of liberty seem caught off guard. In this urgent hour, can we summon the courage to stand up before everything we claim to hold dear slips away?Such was the tenor of a recent “Unfiltered Conversation” between Law21 legal analyst Jordan Furlong and LawDroid CEO Tom Martin: two voices united by conviction that speaking out now is not only permissible but a moral imperative. Their dialogue, frank and unguarded, comes at a time when so many of us harbor grave worries we only dare whisper behind closed doors. It is, in short, the conversation a free people desperately need to have in public.LawDroid Manifesto is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Unfiltered, Because the Stakes Are Too HighMartin began by explaining why these conversations must be “unfiltered.” Lawyers are trained to weigh risks, parse language, and speak cautiously. But with the political ground shifting in alarming ways: tariffs wielded like weapons, constitutional protections undermined, and entire swaths of society cast as “enemies”, now is not the time for polite half-measures.“Given the urgency,” Furlong declared, “it’s incumbent upon us to say there are bad things happening, and we need to do something about it.” Their shared conviction that silence enables these encroachments underpins this dialogue. As Martin put it, certain critical truths are being discussed “in private messages and closed circles,” but we need them out in the open, where we can illuminate a path for each other and galvanize action.Allies Turned Adversaries: The U.S.-Canada RiftWhat does it mean when the government of the United States, once a stalwart beacon of democratic principles, launches crippling tariffs against decades-old allies, including Canada, in ways that seem designed to provoke rather than negotiate?For Martin, who was born and raised in Los Angeles but became a naturalized Canadian citizen, seeing the two nations at odds is nothing short of heartbreaking. There is a monument at the Peace Arch border crossing in Vancouver that describes Americans and Canadians as “brethren,” bonded by a shared tradition. Now, references to “51st state” status and “Governor Trudeau” cut deeply into Canadian notions of sovereignty. As Furlong notes, this economic hostility also carries a symbolic weight, a betrayal of trust that will not easily be repaired.The question is not just about trade deficits or tariff policies. The broader worry is “the forgetting of why” we built cooperative, interlocking alliances after the devastation of two world wars. Mutual dependence was the antidote to conflict. Yet we have forgotten those lessons, succumbing to a zero-sum logic that sets every nation against each other.Intellectual Attack: Higher Education Under SiegeFrom tariff wars to assaults on universities may seem a leap, but Furlong underscores a stark continuity: autocratic governments inevitably target centers of learning. Institutions like Columbia University, hoping at first to appease, found themselves making untenable concessions. Other campuses soon realized this was no mere push for “balanced viewpoints,” it was an attempt to extinguish intellectual independence altogether.Again, we see “the forgetting of why.” Universities exist to cultivate free debate, rigorous inquiry, and critical thought, bulwarks against tyranny. Yet if the state can dictate what, and how, they may teach, we lose the very engines that generate new ideas and preserve civic values.Law Firms Capitulating: The Slippery Slope to ChaosEven more alarming than the crackdowns on universities is the surrender of several major American law firms to pressures from the Trump administration, reportedly signing deals that dilute their independence in exchange for continued access to lucrative government work. It is an unprecedented development. Historically, law firms have served as guardians of justice, sworn to uphold not any particular figure but the rule of law itself.Yet Furlong admits a wrenching complexity: These firms employ thousands of people; their partners and associates have families to feed. They may feel cornered, if not outright threatened. But he reminds us that lawyers take an oath to defend constitutional principles. The oath has meaning only if, when push comes to shove, lawyers, and the firms that employ them, choose honor over profit.Martin invokes the old Shakespeare line, “First thing you do is kill all the lawyers,” reminding us that the phrase is not simply an anti-lawyer joke. It is the cold rationale of any would-be tyrant: neutralize the legal profession, and there is no one left to enforce the rule of law. Once law firms cave to political intimidation, who will stand up to the state when rights are trampled?Abrego Garcia Case: When the Courts Are MockedConsider the story of Kilmar Abrego Garcia: a husband and father, summarily detained and sent to El Salvador without any due process, in what the Trump administration called "an administrative error.” Abrego Garcia is a citizen of El Salvador, allowed to live and work legally in the United States. Lower courts have insisted Garcia be returned, even the Supreme Court ruled unanimously to “facilitate” that outcome, and still, the administration refuses to comply. What does it mean when the executive branch ignores the highest court in the land?It means democracy is on life support. Our system rests upon checks and balances, with the judiciary guarding our constitutional rights. If the executive no longer recognizes these limits, if court orders become “optional,” then we are watching the unraveling of the very architecture of freedom.Freedom Dies When We Forget WhyAgain and again, Martin and Furlong return to this refrain: “the forgetting of why.” Why did we build alliances? To prevent another catastrophic war. Why do we protect academic freedom? Because without new ideas and fearless debate, tyranny flourishes. Why does the legal profession exist? To ensure that, rich or poor, powerful or vulnerable, we all stand equal before the law.These things are easily taken for granted—until they are gone. Neither the U.S. Constitution nor Canada’s Charter of Rights can magically defend themselves. They require constant renewal by citizens aware of what is at stake. Democracy dies in silence.An Historic Call to ActionWe are living through a moment that calls us, individually and collectively, to take up the mantle of past generations who fought for democracy, whether on battlefields or in courtrooms. Martin’s personal history, spanning a father, uncle and great grandfather who fought in Korea, World War II, and World War I, resonates here. People in those eras understood the cost of neglecting tyranny until it was too late.Furlong emphasizes that no institution, no matter how storied, can rescue us if we the people stand idly by. “Nobody gets to go through life without having one of these challenges placed to them,” he reminds us, pointing to Ukraine as a modern-day example of a people’s fierce resolve in the face of existential threat. “This is our time.”Because Tomorrow Is Not PromisedIt is tempting to assume “the system will hold,” that “someone else will fix it,” that “things like that can’t happen here.” Yet history tells us that complacency is a fragile shield. Our freedoms erode when we shrug and say nothing. Our institutions degrade when we allow intimidation to become policy. Our democracy fails when we see injustice befalling someone else, an immigration lawyer, a neighbor, or a different nation, and assume it does not concern us.‘No, Not on My Watch!’Still, optimism remains. True, cynicism is easy in a world that “has gone mad,” but cynicism is a surrender. Furlong and Martin see a different path, a refusal to succumb. If enough people make that simple moral stand (“No, you cannot do this”), democracy stands a chance. If enough of us reclaim the reasons behind our institutions, we can salvage the rule of law from chaos.History shows the power of ordinary men and women who stand firm. They are not all warriors with rifles; many are citizens simply refusing to yield. Citing Abraham Lincoln’s parable, Furlong notes that calling a dog’s tail a leg does not make it one. So too, calling our fundamental liberties meaningless does not negate their value, unless we agree to let them slip away.A Renewed CovenantThe conversation ends where all great awakenings begin: with a call to realize that we are the stewards of democracy. The Constitution is paper unless people breathe life into it. Alliances are mere treaties unless citizens on both sides of a border defend them. Free speech is abstract unless we speak up in the face of threats.Martin conceived “Unfiltered Conversations” precisely to model this courage, showing that if you are fearful or angry about our eroding institutions, you are not alone. The rule of law can endure only through unflinching public witness. “We should feel entitled; we have a right, to talk about this,” Martin says. “That’s exactly why I wanted to have this conversation.”In the end, that is precisely the point. If you value living in a free society, a place where you can raise your children without fear of arbitrary arrest, where you can challenge authority without losing your livelihood, where you can study and speak freely, then accept this invitation. Be the person who stands up, who says “No,” who refuses to let democracy vanish on their watch. History may yet record that this was our defining hour, the moment when ordinary citizens rose to their full stature and claimed the rights and institutions their ancestors built, so that generations to come will never forget why we fought for them in the first place.We are at the threshold of a crucial chapter in our shared story. Let us choose courage. Let us stand for principle, publicly, unequivocally, and together.LawDroid Manifesto is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.lawdroidmanifesto.com/subscribe

Join me as I interview Martin Ertl, CEO of Recital, who shares his journey from physicist to lawyer to legal tech entrepreneur. Martin reveals how his experience as general counsel inspired him to create solutions that work with lawyers' existing tools rather than forcing them to adopt new ones. Discover how Recital uses AI to reduce contract management implementation from months to days by automatically organizing documents and extracting data while maintaining security and confidentiality. Martin's pragmatic approach to legal innovation offers valuable lessons for anyone interested in creating technology that enhances rather than disrupts professional workflows. For more conversations with legal innovators transforming the profession, visit www.lawdroidmanifesto.com. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.lawdroidmanifesto.com/subscribe

In Episode 13 of LawDroid Manifesto, I sit down with Sateesh Nori, who spent 20 years representing tenants in NYC housing court before pivoting to AI advocacy. Sateesh shares how his development of Roxanne AI is helping bridge the justice gap by providing "actionable legal information" to those who can't access attorneys. He discusses his work with AI University and why law schools must embrace AI education to prepare future lawyers. For deeper insights on legal innovation and exclusive content from thought leaders reshaping the legal landscape, visit lawdroidmanifesto.com where subscribers get early access to episodes and bonus materials. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.lawdroidmanifesto.com/subscribe

Join me on the LawDroid Manifesto podcast where I sit down with Maya Markovich, a visionary working at the intersection of legal innovation and social impact. As VP at the American Arbitration Association's Institute and Executive Director of the Justice Tech Association, Maya reveals how technology can help address America's staggering justice gap where 92% of people can't access legal help for everyday problems. She shares insights from her unique career journey spanning psychology, change management, and legal innovation. For deeper conversations on transforming the legal system through technology, visit lawdroidmanifesto.com where subscribers get exclusive content on navigating our rapidly evolving profession. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.lawdroidmanifesto.com/subscribe

In this thought-provoking episode, I interview Sean West, co-founder of Hence.ai and author of "Unruly," who explains how the collision of politics, technology, and law creates unprecedented business risks. Sean introduces his "Unruly Triangle" framework, demonstrating how these three domains interact to create synthetic challenges most organizations aren't structured to handle. Drawing from his background in political risk analysis and legal technology, Sean offers practical strategies for navigating this complex landscape. For deeper dives into how legal innovation is reshaping our profession, visit lawdroidmanifesto.com for exclusive content and join our community of forward-thinking legal professionals. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.lawdroidmanifesto.com/subscribe

Raymond Blyde, founder of Legal Complex and Sabayo, reveals why he recently closed his legal tech ventures and shares critical insights about AI's impact on the legal profession. Drawing from his unique background in legal knowledge engineering and data analytics, Raymond offers a candid assessment of the economic challenges facing law firms adopting AI and articulates the paradox of embracing technology that may ultimately transform the profession. For exclusive content and extended interviews with legal innovators reshaping the industry, visit www.lawdroidmanifesto.com where subscribers get deeper analysis and early access to our most revealing conversations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.lawdroidmanifesto.com/subscribe

Join me for an inspiring conversation with Patricia Gannon, founder of Platforum9 and former leader of a 250-person law firm across eight Balkan markets. From her early days in rural Ireland to pioneering legal services in post-war Serbia, Patricia shares how entrepreneurial thinking and international perspective shaped her remarkable career. Now she's revolutionizing how lawyers connect globally through her innovative social audio platform. Discover practical insights about building professional communities, leveraging your unique strengths, and maintaining human connection in our digital age. For more thought-provoking conversations with legal innovators, visit www.lawdroidmanifesto.com. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.lawdroidmanifesto.com/subscribe

Hey there Legal Rebels! 👋 I'm excited to share with you the eighth episode of the 2025 season of the LawDroid Manifesto podcast, where I will be continuing to interview key legal innovators to learn how they do what they do. I think you're going to enjoy this one!If you want to understand how process optimization and innovative thinking can transform legal aid organizations and dramatically expand access to justice, you need to listen to this episode. Conor is at the forefront of applying technology to legal challenges and has a unique background that combines theology, restaurant management, and legal expertise.LawDroid Manifesto is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Using Technology to Amplify Access to JusticeJoin me as I interview Conor Malloy, the Director of Innovation at CARPLS (Coordinated Advice and Referral Program for Legal Services), who previously led the development of Rentervention, an award-winning legal chatbot for tenants.In this insightful podcast episode, Conor shares his fascinating journey from working in restaurant kitchens to becoming a legal innovator. He explains how his background in theology and ethics led him to law as a vehicle to make a meaningful difference in people's lives, and how his experience in high-volume restaurant work taught him valuable lessons about process optimization that he now applies to legal services.Conor dives deep into his work developing Rentervention, a chatbot that helps tenants navigate housing issues, and how he transformed it from a deterministic system to one using natural language processing. He also discusses his vision for the future of legal aid at CARPLS, where he's exploring how technology can help serve more clients, collect better data, and enable prevention-focused interventions.His stories and insights underscore how small efficiency improvements, when scaled across thousands of interactions, can dramatically expand access to justice while improving working conditions for legal aid lawyers and staff.The SkinnyConor Malloy, the new Director of Innovation at CARPLS, shares his journey from theology student to legal innovator. Inspired by a professor who challenged him to make a tangible difference in people's lives, Conor found his calling in using technology to expand access to justice. He discusses how his experience in restaurant kitchens taught him crucial lessons about process optimization that he later applied to legal practice. At Rentervention, Conor transformed a rule-based chatbot into a more natural conversational system, dramatically improving its ability to help tenants. Now at CARPLS, he's working to revolutionize how a legal aid organization that handles 90,000 consultations annually can use technology and data to serve more people, follow up on outcomes, and even prevent legal problems before they occur.Key Takeaways:* Process optimization skills from restaurant work directly translate to legal innovation - every second saved across thousands of interactions creates massive efficiency* Moving from deterministic chatbot menus to natural language processing dramatically improved user experience in Rentervention* Legal aid organizations like CARPLS face significant demand they cannot currently meet, creating opportunity for technological solutions* Knowledge management systems are crucial for scaling legal aid services* Technology can help create longitudinal relationships with clients to measure outcomes and improve services* Collecting and analyzing data at scale enables preventative interventions that address issues before they require legal help* Innovation in legal services isn't just about increasing productivity - it should also improve quality of life for legal professionalsNotable Quotes:* "If what we're learning here does not feed the hungry, if it doesn't comfort the sick, if it doesn't shelter the homeless, then none of what I'm teaching you is really worth a damn." - Conor's Professor (13:46-14:16)* "My work is my ministry in a lot of ways... using the talents that we have, it can really do great work." - Conor Malloy (16:44-17:38)* "I had a chef one time. He told me, I can teach a monkey to cook, but your last dish of the night has to look like the first dish." - Conor Malloy (10:37-10:41)* "I flipped the script where I got rid of that menu and I put the natural language free form at the front end and just let people do that. And that's when, I think that's when it really started to get awesome." - Conor Malloy (35:04-35:17)* "With some of the efficiencies... if you can decrease a call by slimming down a knowledge base article and making them more navigable and you take 10 seconds off of a call, right? Multiply that times 90,000." - Conor Malloy (50:09-50:23)* "We were automating between 4,000 and 6,000 administrative tasks per week... What did that allow us to do? It didn't allow us to just make money like gangbusters... At 3 o'clock on Friday afternoons, we would turn on the WWE Network and we would put on a classic WWE wrestling match... crack a beer and we'd kick back and enjoy life." - Conor Malloy (56:33-57:09)ClipsAI’s Transformative Impact on Legal PracticesConsistency From Cooking to Legal TechGaining Perspective Through TechnologyPersonal Motivation for Pursuing Family LawInnovating Client Acquisition using TechnologyConor Malloy brings a refreshing perspective to legal innovation by focusing not just on efficiency and scale, but on the human elements as well. His ability to draw connections between seemingly unrelated fields - from restaurant kitchens to theology to legal aid - demonstrates how cross-disciplinary thinking can lead to breakthrough innovations. His work at Rentervention and now CARPLS shows how seemingly small improvements, when implemented at scale, can dramatically expand access to justice.Closing ThoughtsWhat strikes me most about my conversation with Conor is his human-centered approach to innovation. While many in legal tech focus primarily on efficiency or profit, Conor is driven by a deeper purpose, using technology to help people in need while also improving the quality of life for legal professionals.His insight about translating lessons from restaurant kitchens to legal services is brilliant: both are high-volume operations where small process improvements can have massive impacts across thousands of interactions. But I especially appreciate his perspective that technology should create not just productivity but breathing room for people to enjoy their work and lives.As we continue exploring AI and other technologies in legal services, Conor's vision reminds us that the ultimate measure of innovation isn't just how many more cases we can handle, but whether we're truly improving outcomes for clients and quality of life for practitioners. That's the kind of innovation our profession desperately needs.By the way, as a LawDroid Manifesto subscriber, I’d like to invite you to an exclusive event…What: LawDroid AI Conference 2025Day 1 - 7 panel sessions, including top speakers like Ed Walters, Carolyn Elefant, Bob Ambrogi, and Rob Hanna—they’re well familiar with how to harness AI as a force multiplier.Day 2 - It will also feature 3 hands-on workshops from AI experts and demos from over a dozen legal AI companies where you can discover the latest and greatest technology to get you ahead.Where: Online and FreeWhen: March 19-20, 2025, 8am to 5pm PTHow: Register Now!Click here to register for free and secure your spot. Space is limited. Don’t risk being left behind.Cheers,Tom MartinCEO, LawDroidP.S. Check out the Day 1 & Day 2 schedule—packed with panels, workshops, demos, and keynotes from the industry’s leading experts. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.lawdroidmanifesto.com/subscribe

Hey there Legal Rebels! 👋I’m excited to share with you the seventh episode of the 2025 season of the LawDroid Manifesto podcast, where I will be continuing to interview key legal innovators to learn how they do what they do. I think you’re going to enjoy this one!If you want to understand how power imbalances and lack of workplace protections in the judiciary harm young lawyers, and how technology can drive accountability in traditionally opaque institutions, you need to listen to this episode. Aliza Shatzman has transformed the clerkship landscape through an innovative legal tech platform that exposes judicial misconduct and empowers law students to make informed career decisions.LawDroid Manifesto is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Breaking the Silence: Revolutionizing Judicial Accountability in Law ClerkshipsJoin me as I interview Aliza Shatzman, founder of the Legal Accountability Project and trailblazing advocate for judicial reform who won multiple categories at the American Legal Technology Awards.In this powerful podcast episode, Aliza shares her personal experience with judicial misconduct and how it drove her to create the first-ever transparency platform for law clerks. She reveals the systemic issues within the judiciary, including the shocking lack of workplace protections and the culture of silence that enables abuse. Aliza discusses how her organization's innovative database is revolutionizing the clerkship landscape by giving law students unprecedented insight into judges as managers.Her story illustrates how technology can pierce institutional opacity and drive accountability in the legal system. This episode is a must-watch for law students, legal professionals, and anyone interested in understanding how innovative solutions can transform deeply entrenched power structures within our justice system.The SkinnyIn this eye-opening episode, Aliza Shatzman shares how her negative experience as a judicial law clerk led her to found the Legal Accountability Project, the first nonprofit dedicated to ensuring positive clerkship experiences. After facing harassment and retaliation during her own clerkship, she discovered that judicial employees lack basic workplace protections. This revelation sparked her mission to create unprecedented transparency in the judiciary through an innovative legal tech platform.Key Takeaways* Federal judicial employees are exempt from all anti-discrimination laws, including Title VII protections, leaving law clerks vulnerable to harassment and retaliation* The Legal Accountability Project's database functions like "Glassdoor for judges," with nearly 1,500 reviews of over 1,000 judges, democratizing previously hidden information* Law schools often prioritize clerkship placement numbers over student wellbeing, sometimes knowingly sending students to work for abusive judges* Internal reporting mechanisms within the judiciary are largely ineffective, with fewer than five law clerk complaints filed per year despite widespread issues* The federal judiciary has consistently opposed oversight and reform efforts, including recent legislation that would extend workplace protections to judicial employees* The project charges students $40 for annual access to the database, ensuring independent operation without relying on law schools or the judiciaryNotable Quotes* "The federal judiciary is exempt from all anti-discrimination protections - Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, paid family leave, union organizing... everything, everything. They're exempt from basically all laws." - Aliza Shatzman (15:32-15:49)* "We have democratized judicial clerkship information. We have upended the clerkship system and replaced the really dangerous clerkship whisper network." - Aliza Shatzman (32:30-32:44)* "There is no greater power disparity in the legal profession right now between that of a life tenured federal judge and a fresh out of law school judicial clerk in their first job, totally dependent on that judge for references and career advancement." - Aliza Shatzman (15:02-15:19)* "LAP has no misaligned incentives. I have no ulterior motive. My motive is ensuring that you as a law student go into a positive clerkship experience." - Aliza Shatzman (51:49-52:01)* "The only way to change the system is if every single one of you says no to abuse and says, I'm going to demand better for myself and for my peers." - Aliza Shatzman (52:30-52:43)ClipsLAP’s Strategy for Providing Honest Clerkship InformationClerking Under an Abusive JudgeCulture of Fear and Silence in Judicial MisconductJudicial Law Clerks Exempt from Anti-Discrimination Laws Mission Driven by AccountabilityThe Legal Accountability Project represents a crucial step toward reforming a system that has long operated without meaningful oversight or accountability. Through technology and transparency, Shatzman is empowering the next generation of legal professionals to make informed decisions about their careers while building pressure for systemic change in the judiciary. Her work demonstrates how innovation can help address deeply entrenched power imbalances in our legal institutions.Closing ThoughtsWhat Aliza Shatzman has built with the Legal Accountability Project is truly remarkable. While judicial clerkships have long been viewed as prestigious career stepping stones, she's exposed the dangerous lack of protections for clerks and created a concrete solution through technology.Her work shows how innovation can pierce through institutional opacity and drive real change. By democratizing information about judges through her database platform, she's not just helping individual law students make better career decisions - she's building pressure for systemic reform of the judiciary.Most inspiring is how Aliza transformed her own negative experience into positive change for others. Rather than being silenced by retaliation, she built an independent platform that gives voice to those who previously had none. Her efforts to bring accountability to one of our most powerful institutions demonstrate the critical role legal technology can play in advancing justice.The Legal Accountability Project stands as an example of how thoughtful innovation, combined with unwavering mission focus, can begin to shift even the most entrenched power dynamics. For anyone interested in how technology can drive institutional change, Aliza's work provides an inspiring blueprint.By the way, as a LawDroid Manifesto subscriber, I’d like to invite you to an exclusive event…What: LawDroid AI Conference 2025Day 1 - 7 panel sessions, including top speakers like Ed Walters, Carolyn Elefant, Bob Ambrogi, and Rob Hanna—they’re well familiar with how to harness AI as a force multiplier.Day 2 - It will also feature 3 hands-on workshops from AI experts and demos from over a dozen legal AI companies where you can discover the latest and greatest technology to get you ahead.Where: Online and FreeWhen: March 19-20, 2025, 8am to 5pm PTHow: Register Now!Click here to register for free and secure your spot. Space is limited. Don’t risk being left behind.Cheers,Tom MartinCEO, LawDroidP.S. Check out the Day 1 & Day 2 schedule—packed with panels, workshops, demos, and keynotes from the industry’s leading experts. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.lawdroidmanifesto.com/subscribe