Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

This podcast episode explores the Supreme Court's focus on the spending clause over emergency healthcare for women, the Capitol insurrection, and Trump's attempts to overturn the election. Legal experts critique the MAGA justices in arguments. Discussions include challenges to presidential prosecution, erosion of democratic principles, and the court's indifference to health crises.

The podcast discusses the recent court cases on pregnancy care in emergency rooms and presidential immunity. It explores the impact on women's lives, the conflict over abortion laws post Dobbs decision, and denial of emergency abortions in states with strict laws.

Slate's senior legal writer Mark Joseph Stern discusses the challenges and pitfalls of the first criminal trial of a former President. They cover the jury selection process in Manhattan, concerns about armed insurrection, civil rights protections in the workplace, and exclusive SCOTUS analysis for Slate Plus members.

The podcast delves into a Supreme Court case challenging EMTALA regulations for pregnant patients in the ER. It also discusses the potential ramifications of the case on abortion care. Additionally, the episode explores the controversy surrounding Justice Sotomayor's retirement and the gendered dynamics of the SCOTUS. Overall, a thought-provoking discussion on healthcare, legal battles, and judicial concerns.

Legal and national security expert Juliette Kayyem joins the podcast to dissect Trump's impact on legal, national security, and ideological fronts. They discuss Trump's use of threats and intimidation in his campaign, the need for focus and planning for the upcoming months, and the implications for democracy. Kayyem provides insights from a counter-terrorism perspective and preparation for the 2024 elections.

Lisa Graves from True North Research discusses the influence of the Republican Attorneys General Association, revealing pay-to-play schemes and manipulation in legal and legislative outcomes. The discussion highlights connections to corporate funding, Justice Clarence Thomas, and Leonard Leo's Supreme Court influence. The role of the Rule of Law Defense Fund in election controversy and the impact of state attorneys general on anti-abortion laws are also explored.

The podcast explores the legal battle over mifepristone, FDA approval, and telemedicine abortion, highlighting the impact on reproductive rights. Carrie N. Baker discusses the potential consequences of restricting access to abortion pills through mail. The show also covers legal challenges against former President Trump and his financial obligations.

A case at SCOTUS on online censorship by government agencies and social media, affecting election workers' safety. Brennan Center's amicus brief highlights election disinformation concerns. Later, discussion on 5th U.S. Circuit Court and teen contraception access.

The podcast discusses the prevalence of disinformation in America, focusing on how it affects democracy. They analyze the recent Supreme Court decision involving Trump and explore the challenges of misinformation in politics. Member-exclusive segment covers Biden's SCOTUS statement, Alabama's state supreme court, and liberal justices' concurrence in restoring Trump to the Colorado primary ballot.

Supreme Court rules on Trump's eligibility for Colorado ballot despite insurrectionist ties. Conservative justices consolidate power while liberals and Barrett disagree. Analysis of limited accountability post January 6 insurrection. Legal battle over 14th amendment enforcement and state authority to disqualify presidential candidates.