Will the Supreme Court Step Into Trump’s Hush Money Conviction?
Jun 1, 2024
auto_awesome
Exploring the implications of Trump's hush money conviction, potential appeal, Supreme Court intervention, and the role of a gag order. Guest Ryan Goodman provides expert analysis on the legal proceedings and political ramifications.
49:57
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Donald Trump convicted of 34 felony counts for hush money payments, setting accountability precedent.
Jury emphasized election fraud in Trump's case, showing significance of legal adherence and implications.
Deep dives
Donald Trump Convicted of Felony Crimes
Former President Donald Trump convicted of 34 felony counts for falsifying business records to hide hush money payments before the 2016 election. The New York prosecution led by Alvin Bragg resulted in a unanimous guilty verdict on all counts, even amidst significant defense tactics and threats by Trump. This landmark conviction reflects the accountability and rule of law even for individuals like Trump who appeared immune.
Jury Instructions in Trump's Case
The jury in Trump's case had to find him guilty of falsifying business records with an intent to commit or conceal election fraud. The jury had three alternative pathways to consider under New York law: federal election law violations, tax fraud, and other false business records. The jury did not need to be unanimous on the unlawful means involved, showing a clear emphasis on election fraud.
Trump's Sentencing and Potential Appeal
Trump faces sentencing on July 11 as a convicted felon, with implications like restrictions on gun ownership and potential imprisonment. Despite a likely appeal, legal experts suggest a good chance of a prison sentence given multiple factors, including lack of remorse and past civil case convictions against Trump. The likelihood of incarceration despite appeals strengthens due to the gravity of the case.
Implications on Trump's Ongoing Legal Battles
The conviction of Donald Trump sets a significant precedent in the legal and democratic spheres, impacting other legal battles he faces, including the January 6 cases. The verdict marks a victory for journalism, investigative reporting, and public accountability, showcasing the role of legal and media institutions in upholding the rule of law. The fragility of public confidence in these institutions amidst polarization and threats to democracy remains a key concern moving forward.
As a jury in Lower Manhattan responded with “guilty” to all 34 felony counts in former President and presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald J. Trump’s hush money trial on Thursday, dozens and dozens more questions began to swirl. Will Trump appeal? On what grounds? Will Justice Juan Merchan sentence Trump to jail time? Will the US Supreme Court intervene? Is the gag order still active and in place? Luckily, we have the perfect guest on Amicus to answer all those questions to the extent that it is humanly and expert lawyerly possible. Ryan Goodman is the Anne and Joel Ehrenkranz Professor of Law at New York University School of Law. He served as special counsel to the general counsel of the Department of Defense (2015-16). He is also the founding co-editor-in-chief of the national security online forum, Just Security, a vital resource if you are trying to follow the many trials and appeals of Donald J Trump.
Want more Amicus? Subscribe to Slate Plus to immediately unlock exclusive SCOTUS analysis and weekly extended episodes. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen.