Open to Debate

Derek Thompson argues that while we excel at spotting problems, our solutions often lag behind. He discusses his book 'Abundance' and the need for introspection within political ideologies. The conversation tackles economic progressivism, the tension between supply and demand, and critiques the Democratic Party’s management issues. They also dive into government roles, healthcare access challenges, and the complexities of the housing crisis. Emphasizing civil discourse, the discussion highlights the importance of innovative ideas for a more abundant society.

Kadie Ward, the Commissioner and Chief Administrative Officer of Ontario's Pay Equity Commission, advocates for addressing the gender wage gap, citing systemic barriers and the positive economic impact of pay equity. In contrast, Allison Schrager, a Pension Economist and Bloomberg Opinion Contributor, argues that the wage gap reflects personal choices rather than discrimination. They explore how policies like childcare could support women's workforce participation and discuss the implications of societal norms and recent workplace changes.

Richard Gowan, a non-resident fellow at NYU's Center on International Cooperation, and Hillel Neuer, Executive Director of UN Watch, dive into the UN's role in the Middle East. Gowan argues that UN forces act as critical buffers in the Israel-Palestine conflict to prevent escalation. In contrast, Neuer challenges this view, claiming the UN's actions often lack neutrality and exacerbate tensions. They explore the effectiveness of UNRWA and peacekeeping forces while debating their impact on regional stability and humanitarian issues.

In this engaging discussion, Michael W. McConnell, a former U.S. Court of Appeals Judge and law professor at Stanford, debates the legality of Elon Musk's actions involving DOGE. He examines the intricate legal dynamics and potential conflicts of interest stemming from Musk’s government role. The conversation dives into constitutional concerns, the impacts of technology on legality, and accountability within the Trump administration. McConnell’s insights challenge assumptions about governance and ethics, making for a thought-provoking exchange.

Joan Costa-i-Font, a health economist at the London School of Economics, and Binyamin Appelbaum, a member of the New York Times editorial board, dive into a lively debate about the relevance of Daylight Savings Time. Costa-i-Font argues that the time change harms health and productivity, while Appelbaum defends its role in enhancing our quality of life. They explore the historical origins, public sentiment, and legislative challenges surrounding this timekeeping practice, making a compelling case for why it's time to rethink the clock.

Stephen Moore, an economist and senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation, and Scott Paul, president of the Alliance for American Manufacturing, argue for tariffs as essential tools for national security and supporting domestic production. On the opposing side, Jennifer Hillman from the Council on Foreign Relations highlights their potential economic harm and legal issues, while Rana Mitter from Harvard emphasizes the ineffectiveness of tariffs and advocates for alternative strategies. The discussion delves into the complex landscape of trade policies and their implications for U.S.-China relations.

In a thought-provoking conversation, Harold Koenig, Director at Duke University’s Center for Spirituality, explores how religion may provide social support to combat loneliness. Senator Chris Murphy highlights the global loneliness crisis, advocating for community solutions. In contrast, Ruth Whippman argues for secular approaches as more inclusive, while Dan Barker critiques the potential alienation caused by organized religion. Together, they tackle the complex interplay between faith, community, and mental health in today's society.

In this engaging discussion, Maria Avgitidis, a seasoned matchmaker and CEO of Agape Match, debates with Melissa Hobley, Global CMO of Tinder. They dive into the paradox of choice in dating apps and the quest for authentic connections. Avgitidis argues that these platforms lead to superficial interactions, while Hobley highlights their convenience and success stories. The conversation also touches on Gen Z's desire for genuine relationships and the shifting norms in modern dating. Tune in for a lively exploration of whether it's time to say goodbye to dating apps!

Join former Senator Jeff Flake, law professors Cristina Rodríguez and Jamal Greene, and ex-Attorney General Jeff Sessions as they tackle the future of the Supreme Court. They debate the contentious idea of term limits for justices, weighing potential benefits against risks of politicization. The conversation delves into judicial independence, external ethics codes, and the implications of expanding the court. The guests also address the striking trust gap between political parties and explore historical factors affecting the court’s legitimacy.

Harry Levant, Director of Gambling Policy at the Public Health Advocacy Institute and certified gambling therapist, dives into the heated debate on legalizing sports gambling. He shares insights on the rise of gambling addiction and its impact on public health. The dialogue contrasts the economic benefits of legalization with ethical concerns and the risks to vulnerable populations. Personal stories of loss highlight the addiction crisis, while discussions reveal the need for effective regulation and collaboration to ensure safer gambling practices.