Debating the impact of wokeness on comedy, comedians discuss if old jokes are off-limits, leading to public apologies. Some argue that political correctness stifles creativity while others believe comedy can evolve with changing norms. The discussion includes cancel culture, free speech, and the intersection of comedy and wokeness, culminating in a live audience vote on whether wokeness is killing comedy.

Debate between marriage and singlehood, highlighting benefits like well-being and societal support for married people. Single individuals argue for independence and broader social networks for personal fulfillment.

The podcast debates whether Islam is antisemitic, analyzing Quranic verses and historical contexts. Speakers argue for and against the claim, discussing the complexity of faith and interpretations of religious texts. The chapter explores the presence of antisemitism in Islam, highlighting cultural, traditional, and historical dimensions. The episode concludes with remarks on constructive dialogue and credits to team members and sponsors.

Debates on government censorship and misinformation on social media platforms, with attorneys arguing about free speech rights. Exploring the complexities of coercion, public safety, and the potential authoritarian control online. Mock trial setting with experts discussing the implications of government involvement in tech companies' decision-making processes and the fine line between providing information and speech suppression.

Debate on whether it is acceptable to pay for sex, comparing the Nordic model with decriminalization. Arguments for respect for sex work and reducing violence clash with concerns of exploitation and coercion. Featuring guests advocating for and against paying for sex, exploring impacts on sex workers and marginalized communities. Civil debate concludes with gratitude and teaser for next episode.

Debating if Taiwan is indefensible against China's aggression, experts argue about US credibility, military presence, and the risks of conflict escalation. The podcast highlights Taiwan's strategic significance, the dilemma of defending or not, and the threats Taiwan faces from China, emphasizing the importance of US commitment to Taiwan's defense.

High school students debate tough topics on college DEI programs and climate change urgency in a national championship. Contestants showcase their preparation, emotional journeys, and intense debates. Former NYC Mayor judges the debate, highlighting the significance of DEI programs and the critical need for immediate action on climate change.

Jeffrey Rosen argues for virtue as a source of happiness, referencing classical writers and the Founding Fathers. The debate explores whether happiness should come from virtue or pleasure, drawing from Stoics, Aristotle, and Locke. Discussions include the importance of self-control, long-term happiness versus short-term pleasures, and the balance between enjoyment and well-being in life.

Debate on FDA regulations and safety of the abortion pill, exploring legal implications and women's health. Attorneys argue for and against restrictions, dissecting complexities of the issue. Insights from legal experts on FDA decisions and access to abortion care. Discussing the need for thorough review for women's safety and the impact of regulations. Concluding with gratitude for participants in the mock trial on abortion pill restrictions.

Exploring the controversy of reinstating the SAT at elite universities, discussing diversity impact. Arguments for and against the SAT, fairness, bias, and diversity in college admissions. Gender gap in SAT performance and challenges of using test scores as predictors of academic success. Wrap up with gratitude to debaters, experts, and audience for engaging in civil discourse.