Citations Needed

This podcast explores how horrific actions in Gaza are spun as humanitarian gestures. Topics discussed include the manipulation of humanitarian language, a controversial plan to resettle Palestinians using foreign aid, the idea of relocating people in Gaza, presenting Israel's actions as liberatory, and a conclusion thanking listeners.

This podcast challenges the narrative that an aging population spells doom for the US economy and social programs. It discusses misleading statistics and narratives surrounding Social Security, examines the portrayal of older adults as a threat, and analyzes the influence of wealthy elites. The speakers propose solutions such as expanding Social Security benefits and taxing the wealthy. They also discuss potential threats to Social Security and the need to defend and expand the program.

Explore the media's portrayal of Israel's 'hunt for Hamas' narrative and its cover for ethnic cleansing in Gaza. Examine false claims and shift of tactics in labeling hospitals as Hamas command centers. Critique media bias and simplified narrative of Israel-Palestine conflict. Analyze headlines on Israeli military's intent to battle Hamas and lack of inquiry into non-Hamas casualties.

This podcast explores the use of military jargon and cliches to sanitize violence. It discusses the ongoing Israeli genocide of Palestinians in Gaza and questions the effectiveness of deterrence strategy. The speakers emphasize the need for clear and accurate language when discussing state violence and highlight the manipulative nature of certain terms. They also delve into how language is used to justify actions and dehumanize certain groups. Overall, the podcast emphasizes the importance of using accurate language to describe acts of violence.

This podcast explores how the media's use of military jargon and cliches obscures the true human costs of war. It discusses the sanitization of military aggression through euphemistic language and the need for clearer terms. The podcast also highlights the dehumanization of targeted populations and the unequal valuing of life in war. It examines how terms like 'boots on the ground' and 'precision airstrikes' downplay violence and create distance. It delves into the manipulation of language in reporting on Israel's actions towards Palestinians and the use of military jargon in political speeches to shape public perception of warfare.

Media's use of 'the economy' flattens class conflict, overlooks the growing issues of homelessness and poverty. The ambiguity and control of 'the economy' by the powerful is discussed. Media's framing of strikes and exaggerated estimates on economic losses are highlighted. The flaws in official unemployment rates as a measure of economic recovery are discussed. The perception of strikes shaped by media framing and the challenges faced by workers in low-wage jobs are explored. Metal genre, freelance work, black lung crisis, and book research are also discussed. The flattening of class conflict through the notion of 'the economy' is examined.

Debunking arguments against a Gaza ceasefire, speculating Israeli government's options including extreme mowing the grass or ethnic cleansing, analyzing power dynamics and double standards in Israel-Palestine conflict, questioning targeting precision and PR tactics in Gaza conflict, urging support for Palestine and advocacy for a ceasefire.

The podcast discusses the liberal response to the Gaza air strikes, questioning their sincerity and the influence of pro-Israel lobbying. It analyzes the unequal treatment of Gaza in the media, genocidal rhetoric from Israeli leaders, and fears of ethnic cleansing. The episode also explores the US government's double game with Israel, lack of coverage of Israeli family members' perspectives, and expresses gratitude to the listeners.

In this podcast, the hosts discuss the media's role in fueling US support for Israel in the recent violence between Palestine and Israel. They explore the asymmetrical condemnation of child killings and criticize major news outlets for their bias in coverage. The podcast highlights the need for realistic analysis, meaningful solutions, and a more thoughtful approach in media coverage of global events.

The podcast explores how the media presents the US as 'forced' to commit human rights abuses. It discusses historical examples, the selective application of human rights discourse, and the double standards in US foreign policy. The hosts also examine the US as the moral authority on incarceration, the responsibility in addressing human rights in an unequal world, and the need to preserve and expand human rights discourse. The podcast concludes with an analysis of US government policies on human rights and a message of gratitude to listeners.