

CounterSpin
Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting
CounterSpin is the weekly radio show of FAIR, the national media watch group.
Episodes
Mentioned books

Jan 19, 2024 • 28min
Gregory Shupak on Gaza and Genocide
How does the New York Times’ assertion that “what Israel is fighting to defend is a society that values human life” stand up now?

Jan 12, 2024 • 28min
Sebastian Martinez Hickey on Minimum Wage, Saru Jayaraman on History of Tipping
Elite reporters are so removed from daily reality that they assume a raise in wages means fast food employees have to lose their jobs.

Jan 5, 2024 • 28min
Chip Gibbons on the Right to Protest
US journalists invoke the First Amendment a lot, but not so much when it extends to regular folks saying NO to the US government.

Dec 29, 2023 • 28min
Best of CounterSpin 2023
CounterSpin is thankful to all the activists, researchers, reporters and advocates who appear on the show to help us see the world more clearly.

Dec 22, 2023 • 28min
Wadie Said on the New McCarthyism
Powerful institutions, including the media, combine a selective understanding of free expression with a vehement desire to enforce it.

Dec 15, 2023 • 28min
Richard Wiles & Matthew Cunningham-Cook on Climate Disruption Filtered Through Corporate Media
We can't have a public conversation about how fossil fuels cause climate disruption in a corporate media moneyed by fossil fuel companies.

Dec 8, 2023 • 28min
Sonya Meyerson-Knox on Jewish Voice for Peace
The devastation of Gaza, and the vehement efforts to silence anyone who wants to challenge it, is the story for today.

Dec 1, 2023 • 28min
Melissa Gira Grant on Abortion Rights & Politics
Too many outlets seem to have trouble shaking the framing of abortion as a "controversy," or as posing problems for this or that politician.

Nov 24, 2023 • 28min
Mark Weisbrot on Argentina’s Javier Milei
Argentina's new president questions the death toll of the country's military dictatorship and calls climate change a “lie of socialism.”

Nov 17, 2023 • 28min
Scott Burris on US v. Rahimi
The question is whether the Court’s conservative majority can use its special brand of backwards-looking to determine this country’s future.