Bloomberg Law

Leon Fresco, an immigration attorney at Holland & Knight, shares insights on ICE's controversial operations in Charlotte and the Supreme Court's consideration of asylum cases. He discusses the implications of strategic choices in immigration enforcement and community responses. Zoe Tillman, a Bloomberg reporter, dives into the latest on settlement negotiations involving Michael Flynn and former Trump officials, shedding light on their motives and the Biden DOJ's defense strategy.

Join Judge John E. Jones III, a former federal district judge, as he discusses the alarming rise in threats to judicial independence, emphasizing the dangers of inflammatory rhetoric. Professor Suzanne Goldberg analyzes recent Supreme Court decisions impacting transgender rights, critiquing the implications of emergency policies on those identities. Additionally, John Meiser delves into a fascinating Rastafarian case, exploring religious liberties in prisons and the complexities of legal remedies for inmates. A thought-provoking conversation on vital legal issues!

Retired federal judge John E. Jones III discusses the alarming rhetoric from the DOJ, expressing concerns about threats to judicial independence and safety. He critiques the characterization of attorney-general conflicts as a 'war.' Labor law expert Kate Andrias analyzes the ongoing Starbucks labor disputes, highlighting the significance of union rights and recent unfavorable rulings. She explains the legal complexities behind contract negotiations and why strikes are essential for workers. Together, they illuminate the current tensions in the judicial and labor landscapes.

John Meiser, a professor at Notre Dame Law School and director of the Religious Liberty Clinic, delves into a Supreme Court case surrounding a Rastafarian inmate's claim of religious rights violations by prison guards. He unpacks the complexities of RELUPA and discusses the implications for monetary damages. Meanwhile, Harold Krent, a constitutional law expert, examines the government's attempt to deploy National Guard forces in Chicago, highlighting the legal challenges and limits of executive authority in domestic troop movements.

Columbia Law School Professor Suzanne Goldberg, a leading expert on sexuality and gender law, discusses the Supreme Court's refusal to hear a same-sex marriage challenge, emphasizing the need for vigilance despite current protections. Bloomberg Law reporter Suzanne Monyak then delves into the Deputy Attorney General's controversial call for a 'war' on judges, touching on the implications of politicizing the judiciary and the increasing threats faced by judges. Both guests highlight significant developments that shape the landscape of legal rights and government accountability.

Timothy Brightbill, co-chair of the international trade practice at Wiley Rein, dives into the Supreme Court's hearing on global tariffs and the implications of the Trump administration's actions. Robert Mintz, a former federal prosecutor, explores the complex defense strategies in the criminal case against James Comey, including challenges over alleged false statements and prosecutorial methods. Finally, Harry First, an NYU Law professor, analyzes Michael Jordan's antitrust lawsuit against NASCAR, focusing on market control and competition dynamics in racing.

Former federal prosecutor Robert Mintz shares insights on James Comey's legal battle, discussing the implications of grand jury irregularities and prosecutorial scrutiny. Antitrust expert Harry First dives into Michael Jordan's fight against NASCAR, revealing the court's ruling that recognizes premier stock car racing as a distinct market. He explains NASCAR's monopsony power and the challenges plaintiffs face in proving damages. The conversation also touches on how these developments might pressure a settlement and the unique dynamics of a jury trial involving a sports icon.

Michael Dorf, a constitutional law professor at Cornell, and Timothy Brightbill, a partner at Wiley Rein specializing in international trade, dive into the Supreme Court's oral arguments regarding Trump's tariffs. They discuss the potential overreach of executive power and the implications of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Key concerns include whether tariffs fall within the statute's language and how rulings on this case might affect trade policy and constitutional authority. The uncertainty of justices' votes adds to the tension regarding future tariff practices.

Eric Talley, a corporate governance expert from Columbia Law School, discusses the Delaware Supreme Court's review of a controversial law linking to Elon Musk's pay package. He offers insights on the law's implications for corporate oversight and potential constitutionality issues. Meanwhile, Bloomberg Law reporter Suzanne Monyak sheds light on the federal judiciary's funding crisis, detailing operational disruptions caused by the shutdown and how it affects criminal defense. The conversation explores legal challenges and the implications for court operations.

In this lively discussion, Pat Parenteau, an environmental law professor at Vermont Law, explores the complexities of the Antiquities Act and the ongoing Bears Ears legal challenge. He sheds light on potential Supreme Court scrutiny and the vagueness of monument protections. Meanwhile, Harold Krent, a constitutional law expert from Chicago-Kent College, tackles the intricacies of SNAP funding, detailing federal judges' rulings and the challenges states face with partial payments. Together, they navigate the intersection of environmental and constitutional law.