Bloomberg Law Justice Department At War With Judges & Starbucks Strikes
Nov 14, 2025
Retired federal judge John E. Jones III discusses the alarming rhetoric from the DOJ, expressing concerns about threats to judicial independence and safety. He critiques the characterization of attorney-general conflicts as a 'war.' Labor law expert Kate Andrias analyzes the ongoing Starbucks labor disputes, highlighting the significance of union rights and recent unfavorable rulings. She explains the legal complexities behind contract negotiations and why strikes are essential for workers. Together, they illuminate the current tensions in the judicial and labor landscapes.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
DOJ Rhetoric Threatens Judicial Integrity
- Deputy AG Todd Blanche calling the DOJ "at war" with judges is destabilizing and irresponsible according to John E. Jones III.
- Judicial criticism from the executive branch risks eroding public trust and increasing threats to judges.
Blurring Lines Between DOJ And Presidency
- Singling out judges by name and blaming them for blocking the executive undermines the separation of powers.
- Jones warns the DOJ and White House appear merged, which damages the judiciary's independence.
Reduce Rhetoric To Protect Judges
- Dial down inflammatory rhetoric aimed at judges to reduce risk of violence and doxxing.
- Protect judges' safety by respecting judicial independence and avoiding targeted public attacks.