Bloomberg Law

Intellectual property litigator Terence Ross, a partner at Katten Muchin Rosenman, discusses Supreme Court oral arguments in a $1 billion music piracy case. Then immigration law expert Leon Fresco, a partner at Holland & Knight, discusses Supreme Court arguments in an asylum case. And Bloomberg Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr, discusses the Supreme Court allowing Texas to use maps that favor Republicans in the midterms. Plus, Joshua Kastenberg, a professor at the University of New Mexico Law School and a former judge and lawyer in the US Air Force, discusses the second strike on an alleged Venezuelan drug boat. June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Joshua Kastenberg, a professor at the University of New Mexico Law School and a former judge and lawyer in the US Air Force, discusses the second strike on an alleged Venezuelan drug boat. Then Judge Paul Michel, who served on the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, discusses the use of threats of impeachment against judges. And Leon Fresco, a partner at Holland & Knight and the head of the Office of Immigration Litigation during the Obama administration, discusses the firing of immigration judges. June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Intellectual property litigator Terence Ross dives into the intricacies of the Supreme Court's oral arguments in a $1 billion music piracy case involving Cox Communications. He explains the complexities of ISP liability and shares insights on the justices' leanings, particularly Justice Alito's unique stance. Additionally, immigration expert Leon Fresco discusses an asylum case, delving into the implications of different review standards and recent policy changes that affect asylum processing. It's a captivating exploration of pivotal legal battles!

Join constitutional law experts David Super and Harold Krent as they dive into critical Supreme Court cases. Super delves into the implications of the death penalty for inmates with conflicting IQ scores and the legal challenges faced by transgender athletes in light of recent bans. Krent discusses the Third Circuit's ruling on the illegal appointment of Alina Habba as New Jersey's U.S. Attorney and its impact on prosecutorial practices. Their insights illuminate the complexities of constitutional law and the evolving landscape of civil rights.

In this insightful discussion, former federal prosecutor Robert Mintz examines the emergency-aid exception in police entries, debating probable cause versus reasonable basis. Law professor Caroline Mala Corbin delves into the implications of Colorado's ban on conversion therapy and how the Supreme Court might categorize it as speech or conduct, impacting similar laws across the nation. Lastly, lawyer Paul Callen offers a critical look at attorney-client interaction limitations during testimony, highlighting ethical dilemmas and practical challenges within courtroom procedures.

David Super, a Constitutional law professor at Georgetown Law, provides insights on the dismissal of charges against James Comey and Letitia James, highlighting vital legal interpretations. Stephen Frank, a former federal prosecutor, unravels a thrilling multinational insider trading ring full of covert tactics and complex coordination. Meanwhile, James Park, a securities law professor at UCLA, critiques the SEC's controversial decision to drop the SolarWinds lawsuit, addressing implications for corporate accountability in cybersecurity disclosures.

Join former federal prosecutor Robert Mintz and election law expert Richard Brafold as they dive into critical legal happenings. Mintz reveals alarming findings about prosecutorial irregularities in Comey's indictment, raising questions about grand jury integrity. He also discusses potential misstatements regarding Fifth Amendment rights. Meanwhile, Brafold unpacks the federal court’s ruling on Texas's racially gerrymandered redistricting map and its implications, alongside concerns about the timing of Supreme Court appeals. It's a legal landscape filled with twists!

In this engaging discussion, Alex Ebert, a senior correspondent at Bloomberg Law, dives into a landmark New Jersey ruling on shaken baby syndrome, critiquing its reliance on medical findings. Jacqueline Thomsen explores the evolving dynamics of the conservative Fifth Circuit, noting how senior judges are influencing decisions toward moderation. Meanwhile, Harold Krent, a constitutional law expert, analyzes the Supreme Court's Jarczyk decision and its implications for agency in-house adjudication, highlighting a growing trend in favor of agencies in legal challenges.

Harry First, an antitrust expert and law professor, dissects the FTC's loss to Meta, focusing on the judge's narrow ruling and the implications for future antitrust cases, especially involving platforms like Amazon. Richard Briffault, an elections law specialist, discusses a federal court's decision against Texas's racially-based redistricting, highlighting the findings that link race to legislative maps. Both guests provide insights on the legal ramifications and potential future rulings from the Supreme Court. This lively discussion sheds light on current challenges in antitrust and voting rights.

Robert Mintz, a former federal prosecutor, sheds light on the issues surrounding the grand jury proceedings related to James Comey, including prosecutorial misstatements and privilege risks. Colin Walke, a cybersecurity and data privacy expert, discusses the challenge posed by tech giants against California's social media law, emphasizing its implications for free speech and age verification requirements. The conversation touches on the potential legal ramifications of these high-profile cases and the ongoing battle between regulation and corporate power.