Politix

This episode explores tension between Biden and the New York Times, media bias in election coverage, and the challenges of non-partisan journalism in the current political climate.

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.politix.fmThis week, Matt and Brian look ahead to looming questions that, under normal circumstances, would be paint-by-numbers developments in a presidential election year: running-mate selection and debates. * President Biden recently confirmed that he intends to debate Donald Trump. Is this a wise decision, and how should he approach the task?* Do Biden’s communication and strategic arms have the right acumen to see Biden through debates and other, similar challenges?* Can Trump have a running mate without attempting to steal his or her money or implicate them in the destruction of American democracy?Then, for paid subscribers, Brian and Matt apply questions raised by the new movie Civil War to real-life, Trump-era political violence incitement. With Trump running free from consequences, and promising to pardon insurrectionists, what’s to stop him from applying the logic of January 6-style mob violence to other goals he may have? Is the logical endpoint of Trumpism a full-scale rebellion from one direction or another, or something slower-burning and harder to discourage? What can liberals and Democrats do to persuade people that the threat is real, without essentially guilt-tripping people into voting blue? We hope you enjoy the conversation, and if you’d like to listen to the whole thing, you can upgrade to paid for a private feed that gets you access to the complete Politix archive and all future episodes. Further reading:* The New York Post reports that the White House wanted to drive Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre out of her job, but chickened out. * RELATEDLY: Joe Biden’s uncle really did crash his warplane in a part of the world where there were lots of cannibals. * Brian on why Democratic frustrations with the mainstream press were bound to boil over, and where things go from here. * Shelby Talcott on how nobody in GOP politics has any idea what Trump wants in a running mate because he’s distracted, selfish, and susceptible to flattery.* Brian on Civil War (with spoilers).

The podcast discusses Biden's polling numbers, his victories in international affairs, and the impact of Trump's legal troubles. They also explore Biden's potential benefits from a growing economy and assess Trump's chances of improving his standing. The episode delves into reflexive critics affecting Biden's approval ratings and the overall negative tone in politics.

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.politix.fmWith Matt on vacation this week, Brian hosts a conversation with Rebecca Roiphe, a New York Law School professor and former Manhattan prosecutor who enforced the very laws Donald Trump is charged with breaking in his first criminal trial. They discuss:* Why legal commentators who criticized District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s theory of the case were factually wrong about the laws at issue and how they are applied;* The importance of enforcing these laws, whether violators represent big businesses or small businesses, and whether their motives were financial, political, personal, or a combination thereof;* Whether it would’ve been a breach of duty for Bragg not to bring charges in this case.Then, paid subscribers hear a more abstract conversation about legal discourse and ethics. Why were so many legal and media elites, including many Trump critics, so eager to line up against Bragg, even as they lacked the subject-matter expertise to know whether Bragg had exceeded his mandate? Even if Bragg had gone fishing for a reason to try Trump on felony charges, would that be a violation of his ethical obligations or his oath of office? Should Trump’s status as an exceptionally high-profile political leader insulate him in any way from accountability for lower-tier felonies, even if law-enforcement officers understand him to be a serial scofflaw?We hope you enjoy the conversation, and if you’d like to listen to the whole thing, you can upgrade to paid for a private feed that gets you access to the complete Politix archive and all future episodes. Correction: Rebecca is a professor at New York Law School, not a New York University law school professor. Brian regrets the error.Further reading:* Brian on why Joe Biden should break his vow of silence and begin commenting on the hush-money case. * Mark Joseph Stern on why he was wrong, initially, to be skeptical of Alvin Bragg’s case and what made him come around.* There’s a new Stormy Daniels documentary on Peacock.

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.politix.fmThis week on Politix, Matt and Brian step back from the news cycle to examine Donald Trump’s policy agenda, and the weird extent to which he’s getting a pass on toxic ideas:* His plan for an across the board 10 percent tariff would make Americans pay more for virtually everything, including groceries;* A big immigration crackdown like the one he’s promised would raise prices further;* But since these ideas are coded as pro American-worker, he faces little pushback for the terrible consequences they’d entail.Then, paid subscribers get a deeper look at whether the threat of these consequences will eventually catch up with Trump, and hear an extended analogy between the politics of tariffs (which would cause more hardship) and the long saga of Medicare for all. Why did Medicare for all lose popularity over time? Might the same thing happen to Trump’s plan to raise banana and coffee prices? And if the key to selling policy is to cloak it in populist language (tariffs, Medicare) could Biden shake up the race by updating his agenda with ideas that unite the Democratic base and appeal to the public more broadly? We hope you’ll upgrade to paid so you can enjoy the whole episode, especially if you’re listening from the White House or Biden campaign headquarters! Further reading:* Matt on House Republicans’ (bad) plan for America. * Brian with a reminder that the 2024 election is about real things.* CAP: “Trump’s Tariff Would Cost the Typical American Household Roughly $1,500 Each Year.”

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.politix.fmThis week on Politix, Brian returns from a long weekend in real America (western Mexico) with some fresh insight on how Trump-stalgia works. He and Matt discuss:* Why fewer people disapprove of Trump lately and why more people seemingly think his sharpest critics have overstated their case;* How lag effects (the persistence of the pandemic and the overturning of Roe after Trump’s term ended) has insulated him from accountability;* Whether Trump’s unique responsibility for the loss of abortion rights and his status as a Florida resident mean this issue will eventually catch up with him.Then, we offer paid subscribers an in-depth look at how public opinion on abortion has changed in the past two years, even if it hasn’t (yet) dragged Trump down. We examine the roles paid and free media might play in making Trump synonymous with Dobbs, and think through ways both party leaders and activists could draw more public attention to abortion rights per se and Trump’s role in abolishing them. Do Democrats have a problem generating free media in general? And finally, a raging debate over which kinds of beach-side resorts are best for aging but young-at-heart millennials. It was a clarifying discussion across the board, and if you’re interested in fleshing all that out we hope you’ll upgrade to paid, and enjoy the whole episode! Further reading:* Matt on the new politics of abortion rights. * Brian on the broader political implications of changing abortion opinion—what if public-opinion polling on high-salience issues just isn’t that useful?* How long can Trump hide from weighing in on the DeSantis abortion ban in his home state, and on whether Florida voters should pass a referendum guaranteeing abortion access?

Julian Sanchez joins Matt and Brian to discuss Trump's legal battles, the decline of white-collar crime prosecutions, and the complexities of characterizing high-profile individuals. They also explore the political dynamics surrounding Trump and the upcoming election, highlighting issues of corruption and accountability.

Discussing Donald Trump's warning of a 'bloodbath' if he loses, the political implications of attacking Trump, and the risks of resistance politics. Exploring reactions to Trump's statements, the disconnect between Democrats' appeals and actions, and the impact of exploiting controversies for political gain.

Discussion on Trump's sudden decision to cut Social Security and Medicare, possible reasons behind the reversal, link to campaign and legal expenses. Analysis of Biden's State of the Union address. Speculation on whether Garland will resign. Examination of Trump's U-turn on right-wing stances and dealings with TikTok. Paid subscribers get deeper insights into these topics.

On this episode, they discuss Trump's pandemic response, Biden's handling of the pandemic, and how Democrats are trying to persuade voters. They explore the impact of COVID-19 on voter sentiments, the challenges faced by different administrations, and the complexities of pandemic management in the political landscape.