The Next Reel Film Podcast

“You're walking out on 85 grand?”MGM's Bold Step into R-Rated TerritoryIn 1968, MGM was looking to break away from their family-friendly reputation and venture into more adult-oriented content. Based on Donald E. Westlake's Parker novel "The Seventh," they brought in Scottish director Gordon Flemyng fresh off his success with Great Catherine. With a stellar ensemble cast led by Jim Brown and a groundbreaking approach to racial representation in crime films, MGM was ready to push boundaries. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the 1968 Crime Films series with a conversation about The Split.Breaking Down This Historic HeistThe Split represents several significant firsts - it was MGM's first R-rated film and featured Jim Brown as one of the first Black leading men in a major studio crime thriller. The film follows McClain (Brown) as he assembles an unlikely crew to rob the LA Coliseum during a playoff game. While the heist itself succeeds, the aftermath leads to betrayal, murder, and an unconventional alliance with a detective (Gene Hackman).The Film's Place in Crime Movie HistoryInnovative team-building sequences showing McLean testing each potential crew memberStrong performances from an all-star cast including Ernest Borgnine, Donald Sutherland, Jack Klugman, Warren Oates, Diahann Carroll, James Whitmore, and Julie HarrisProgressive handling of racial themes without making them the central focusA period-specific heist that could only work in the pre-digital ageQuincy Jones's distinctive musical score setting the 60s moodThe film's unique position as part of the Parker novel adaptation seriesWe both found The Split to be an entertaining and significant entry in the crime film genre, particularly noteworthy for its groundbreaking representation and MGM's willingness to push into edgier territory. The film successfully balances action, character development, and social commentary while delivering a satisfying heist narrative. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchThe Cinematic Legacy of Donald E. WestlakeTheatrical trailerOriginal Material and on AudibleLetterboxd Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!Here’s where you can find us around the internet:The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“It’s bad enough if he’s guilty, but what if he’s innocent and you push him over the edge?”Setting the Stage for a Controversial True Crime AdaptationIn 1966, writer Gerald Frank published his bestselling book about the Boston Strangler case, catching the attention of 20th Century Fox and producer Richard D. Zanuck. Director Richard Fleischer, known for his genre work, was brought on to helm the project. Against initial studio resistance, Tony Curtis lobbied hard for the lead role of Albert DeSalvo, even doing a screen test that convinced Zanuck. The film aimed to tell the story of the infamous Boston Strangler cases while they were still fresh in public memory. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the 1968 Crime Films series with a conversation about The Boston Strangler.Strangling Expectations: A Deep Dive into The Boston StranglerThe film takes a fascinating approach to its subject matter by withholding DeSalvo's appearance until halfway through, building tension through police procedural elements and Henry Fonda's measured performance as John Bottomly. We discuss how Fleischer's innovative use of split-screen techniques helps tell multiple narrative threads simultaneously, while exploring the psychological complexity of the case. Though some period elements feel dated, Tony Curtis delivers a transformative performance that deserved Oscar recognition.Further Investigation into the Film's ImpactRichard Fleischer's masterful direction and experimental visual styleThe film's treatment of psychological themes versus historical accuracyStrong supporting performances from George Kennedy and Sally KellermanContemporary critical response, including Roger Ebert's moral objectionsHow the film stands up against modern true crime adaptationsThe evolution of public understanding of the actual caseThe Boston Strangler remains a compelling piece of cinema despite its historical inaccuracies. While the film takes creative liberties with the true story, its innovative visual style and Curtis's remarkable performance make it a standout entry in the 1968 crime film genre. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal Material and on AudibleLetterboxd Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!Here’s where you can find us around the internet:The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“All four with clean records. No police force in the world knows them or their work. In their fields, the very best.”Unveiling a Hidden Heist Film Gem from 1967In 1967, Italian director Giuliano Montaldo brought together an international cast for an ambitious heist film co-production between Italy, Spain, and West Germany. Coming off his success with The Reckless, which was nominated for the Golden Bear prize at the Berlin International Film Festival, Montaldo secured Edward G. Robinson and Janet Leigh as two of his leads. With legendary composer Ennio Morricone providing the score, the production aimed to create a sophisticated entry in the burgeoning heist film genre. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Heist Films series with a conversation about Montaldo’s 1967 film Grand Slam.Breaking Down This International Heist CaperThe film follows a meticulous plan to rob $10 million in diamonds during Rio's Carnaval, orchestrated by Robinson's retired professor character. We discuss how the film builds tension through its carefully assembled team of specialists and elaborate heist sequence. While the ending has divided audiences over the years, we explore how this twist-filled finale actually enhances the film's themes about crime and betrayal.Key Elements of the Grand Slam Heist• The innovative card catalog system used to assemble the criminal team• Klaus Kinski's intense performance as the ex-military member of the crew• Janet Leigh's role and how her development may have been too much a giveaway, at least through modern eyes• Ennio Morricone's distinctive, Carnaval-influenced score• The technical achievement of the vault robbery sequence• The film's use of international locations, including some clever substitutions (and some bad blue screen)When Plans Come TogetherDespite being somewhat forgotten today, Grand Slam delivers as both a meticulously crafted heist film and an engaging story with great characters. We both rate it highly, appreciating its technical prowess and storytelling even when some of the twists become predictable. The film deserves more recognition among classic heist films of the 1960s for its innovative approach and international flair. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple, Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchTheatrical trailerLetterboxd Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!Here’s where you can find us around the internet:The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“In films, either you’ve got a face or you don’t got a face. You've got a face. Can I have it, please?”A Comedic Heist Caper from an Unlikely CollaborationIn 1966, Peter Sellers sought to work with renowned Italian neorealist director Vittorio De Sica, bringing aboard playwright Neil Simon to pen his first screenplay. Despite De Sica's reported gambling debts motivating his involvement, the collaboration proved challenging. De Sica struggled with Simon's script and Sellers' performance style, while conflicts arose over casting choices, including Sellers' then-wife Britt Ekland. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Heist Films series with a conversation about De Sica’s 1966 film After the Fox.Breaking Down This Fox's Complicated HuntThe film weaves together elements of heist capers and Hollywood satire, following master criminal Aldo "The Fox" Vanucci as he poses as an Italian film director to orchestrate a gold heist. While the premise shows promise, the movie struggles to balance its dual identity as both heist film and industry commentary. However, the stellar performances, particularly from Sellers and Victor Mature (playing a delightfully self-aware version of himself), help elevate the material beyond its structural issues.Key Elements of This Unique Crime Comedy• Peter Sellers' multiple disguises and his protective relationship with his sister (played by then-wife Britt Ekland)• Victor Mature's comeback performance lampooning his own image• The film's satirical take on moviemaking and celebrity culture• Burt Bacharach's memorable earworm title song• The clever setup of the heist using a film production as cover• A somewhat disappointing climactic car chase that fails to deliver on the film's early promiseWhile After the Fox may not fully succeed as either a heist film or industry satire, it offers enough charm and laughs to warrant attention. The film's unique blend of crime caper and showbiz satire, combined with Sellers' comedic prowess, makes it an entertaining entry in both his filmography and the heist genre. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchTheatrical trailerLetterboxd Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!Here’s where you can find us around the internet:The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“A perfect hit! And no pain for the target. Too bad the guy was only 38; just two years older, he'd have been worth three times the points.”Roger Corman's Vision of a Dystopian FutureIn 1974, Roger Corman learned about Norman Jewison's upcoming film Rollerball and decided to capitalize on its publicity by producing his own futuristic sports film. Based on a short story by Ib Melchior inspired by his experiences at the Indianapolis 500, Corman brought on Paul Bartel to direct what would become a satirical commentary on violence in entertainment and totalitarian control. With a budget of just $300,000, Corman assembled a cast including David Carradine and a pre-Rocky Sylvester Stallone to create this violent vision of America's future. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Roger Corman series with a conversation about Bartel’s 1975 film Death Race 2000.Racing Through the Film's Key PointsThe film's unique blend of dark comedy and social commentary creates an engaging discussion about its place in both exploitation cinema and political satire. We explore how Corman's influence shaped the film's development, particularly his push to emphasize comedy and include gratuitous elements that became his trademark. The movie's transformation from a serious script to a more satirical piece showcases Corman's understanding of what would appeal to audiences.Additional Pit Stops in Our Discussion• The cultural context of car-themed movies in the 1970s and their connection to American car culture• David Carradine's performance as Frankenstein and whether he was the right choice for the role• The film's commentary on media manipulation and fan culture• How the limited budget affected the scale of the cross-country race• The surprising franchise legacy, including multiple sequels and remakes• Tak Fujimoto's cinematography and how it enhanced the racing sequencesA Victory Lap Worth TakingDespite its low budget and exploitation elements, Death Race 2000 succeeds as both entertainment and satire. While some critics initially dismissed it, including Roger Ebert who gave it zero stars before later acknowledging its merits, the film has earned its place as a cult classic. Both hosts thoroughly enjoyed the film, with Andy giving it four stars and Pete giving it three stars with a heart on Letterboxd. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal MaterialLetterboxdThis is a member bonus episode. We'd love it if you became a member to support our show, but you’d love it because of everything you get. We have monthly member bonus episodes that only members can access. You also get other monthly member bonus episodes, access to members-only Discord channels, and early releases for every episode. Plus, no ads! And you get to vote on the movies we discuss in our members only episodes! What can we say? It pays to be a member. Learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership — visit TruStory FM.

“This was not intended to be a book-of-the-month club lunch.”A British Heist Film That Set Early Genre StandardsIn 1958, John Boland published his novel The League of Gentlemen, which quickly caught the attention of British filmmakers. Director Basil Dearden, known for his work with Ealing Studios, saw potential in this story of ex-military men planning an elaborate bank robbery. Working with screenwriter Bryan Forbes, who also took a role in the film, Dearden assembled an impressive cast including Jack Hawkins, Richard Attenborough, and Nigel Patrick. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we return to our Heist Films series with a conversation about Dearden’s 1960 film The League of Gentlemen.Breaking Down This Military-Precision HeistThe film follows a group of former military officers who, feeling cast aside by society (and kicked out of the military), band together to execute a sophisticated bank robbery. As we discuss the film, we explore how it handles character development within its large ensemble cast. While some characters receive more attention than others, the film mostly effectively balances its numerous players. Furthermore, we examine how the film's visual elements, particularly the smoke-filled heist sequence with gas masks, create memorable and striking imagery in black and white.Exploring Themes and Cultural ContextThroughout our discussion, we delve into several fascinating aspects of the film:The military hierarchy that naturally reasserts itself among the charactersThe film's commentary on post-war soldiers struggling to find their place in societyThe blend of comedy and crime elements that would influence future heist filmsThe impressive performances, particularly from Jack Hawkins and Richard AttenboroughThe film's innovative use of practical effects, especially during the climactic heist sequenceThe cultural attitudes and gender relations reflected in the filmA Must-Watch Early Heist FilmThe League of Gentlemen stands as an important early entry in the heist film genre, arriving the same year as the original Ocean's 11. While some character development opportunities may have been missed due to the large cast, the film succeeds in delivering both entertainment and social commentary. We both thoroughly enjoyed this British crime caper, particularly appreciating its technical achievements and ensemble performances. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal MaterialLetterboxd Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!Here’s where you can find us around the internet:The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“When I asked for your advice, I didn't mean that you should actually speak.”Rebooting the Jack Ryan FranchiseAfter the success of Patriot Games and Clear and Present Danger, Paramount Pictures aimed to continue the Jack Ryan franchise with an adaptation of The Sum of All Fears. Initially, Harrison Ford was set to reprise his role as Jack Ryan, but he and director Phillip Noyce dropped out due to script issues. Paramount then decided to reboot the franchise with a younger actor, offering the role to Ben Affleck, who received blessings from Ford and Alec Baldwin. With director Phil Alden Robinson on board, the stage was set for a new era of Jack Ryan. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Jack Ryan series with a conversation about Noyce’s 2002 film The Sum of All Fears.A Bold Adaptation Filled with Fascinating Political IntrigueIn this episode, we delve into the daring choices made in adapting Clancy's novel, particularly how the film allows Jack Ryan, the embodiment of institutional intelligence, to fail. The movie's second half, focusing on the aftermath of a devastating bomb blast in Baltimore, surprised us with its engaging portrayal of escalating tensions between the U.S. and Russian presidents. We appreciate how the film questions the intelligence and diplomacy machine by highlighting Ryan's struggle to convey crucial information to decision-makers.(Mostly) Great Performances and Controversial VillainsThroughout our discussion, we praise the performances of James Cromwell as President Fowler, Morgan Freeman as CIA Director William Cabot, and Liev Schreiber as John Clark. However, we do struggle a bit with Affleck playing Ryan. We also express disappointment in the film's decision to replace the Islamic terrorists from the novel with neo-Nazis, feeling that it weakens the story's impact and makes the villains less compelling.Other points:The challenges of adapting Clancy's novel and the script issues that led to the rebootBen Affleck's performance as a younger Jack RyanThe film's depiction of the U.S. and Russian presidents' responses to the crisisAlan Bates and Colm Feore's roles as tepid neo-Nazi villains and their impact on the storyA Thought-Provoking Entry in the Jack Ryan SeriesWhile The Sum of All Fears may not be the most celebrated entry in the Jack Ryan series, it offers a thought-provoking exploration of political intrigue and the consequences of intelligence failures. Despite some weaknesses in its adaptation choices and the lead casting choice, the film's second half delivers a gripping narrative that keeps viewers engaged. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal Material and on AudibleLetterboxd Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!Here’s where you can find us around the internet:The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“The course of action I’d suggest is a course of action I can’t suggest.”The Road to Clear and Present DangerAfter the success of Patriot Games, Paramount Pictures was eager to continue the Jack Ryan series with another adaptation of a Tom Clancy novel. With Harrison Ford set to return as the intrepid CIA analyst and Phillip Noyce back in the director's chair, the stage was set for Clear and Present Danger. The film, released in 1994, brought a new level of complexity to the series, delving into the murky world of covert operations and political machinations. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Jack Ryan series with a conversation about Clear and Present Danger.Navigating the Murky Waters of Clear and Present DangerIn our discussion, we dive into the intricacies of Clear and Present Danger, exploring how the film captures the complexities of the political landscape and the moral ambiguity of covert operations. We examine Harrison Ford's portrayal of Jack Ryan, noting how he brings a different energy to the character compared to his performance in Patriot Games. The film's ability to balance the high-stakes political drama in Washington with the intense action sequences in Colombia is a point of interest, as we analyze how these two seemingly disparate storylines ultimately converge.Uncovering the Layers of CorruptionClear and Present Danger takes us on a journey through the labyrinthine world of government corruption, where personal agendas and political maneuvering take precedence over the greater good. We discuss:The performances of Henry Czerny and Harris Yulin as the villainous Ritter and CutterWillem Dafoe's role as John Clark and the film's portrayal of covert military operationsThe emotional impact of James Earl Jones' character, Admiral Greer, and his relationship with Jack RyanA Thrilling Addition to the Jack Ryan SeriesWhile Clear and Present Danger may not be perfect, it remains a compelling entry in the Jack Ryan series. The film's ability to tackle complex themes and its unflinching look at the darker aspects of government operations make it a thought-provoking and engaging watch. Harrison Ford's performance as Jack Ryan, coupled with the strong supporting cast, elevates the material and keeps the audience invested in the story.Clear and Present Danger stands as a testament to the enduring appeal of Tom Clancy's novels and the Jack Ryan character. Its exploration of political corruption, moral ambiguity, and the consequences of unchecked power remains as relevant today as it was upon the film's release. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal Material or on AudibleLetterboxd Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!Here’s where you can find us around the internet:The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“You walk into a bar, half of whose customers want you dead. You walk up to the IRA's bagman, and in front of his guys, you threaten him? You're not a field man, Jack. You never were. You are an analyst. Analyze that.”The Second Chapter in Jack Ryan's JourneyAfter the success of The Hunt for Red October, Paramount Pictures faced challenges bringing the next Jack Ryan story to the screen. The situation with Alec Baldwin's departure proved contentious, with Baldwin claiming Paramount "cut his throat" by negotiating with another actor (presumably Ford) while still in talks with him. The studio allegedly used Baldwin's Broadway commitment to A Streetcar Named Desire and script approval demands as leverage to make the switch. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Jack Ryan series with a conversation about Phillip Noyce’s 1992 film Patriot Games.Playing Both Sides of the GameThe transition from Baldwin to Ford fundamentally changes the character's dynamics, shifting from a younger analyst to a more seasoned veteran. We explore how this affected the film's tone and action sequences, particularly discussing whether some of the more intense scenes feel appropriate for Ryan's character. The film presents an intriguing mirror story between Ryan and Sean Miller - both men driven by family, albeit in opposing directions. While Ryan fights to protect his family, Miller seeks revenge for his brother's death, creating parallel narratives that drive the story's conflict.Elements That Drive the Action• The controversial casting change and its implications for the franchise• The mirrored narratives of family protection versus family revenge• Sean Bean's memorable performance as vengeful terrorist Sean Miller• The innovative satellite attack sequence that showcases '90s military technology• Debate over the film's balance between analysis and action• The political dynamics of presenting IRA terrorism to American audiences• Discussion of whether the finale's boat chase sequence serves the story effectivelyPatriot Games successfully continues the Jack Ryan franchise while charting its own course, though some creative choices push the character in new directions that don't always align with his analytical roots. The film proves entertaining even as it diverges from the more cerebral approach of its predecessor. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal Material and on AudibleLetterboxd Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!Here’s where you can find us around the internet:The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“You’re in a house of desperate women here, and a long, long way from home.”Roger Corman's Exploitation Cinema: The Story Behind Caged HeatIn the early 1970s, Roger Corman was producing a slew of women-in-prison films, capitalizing on the exploitation genre that had been popular then. When wannabe director Jonathan Demme approached Corman with the idea for Caged Heat, Corman initially declined, believing the subgenre had run its course. Undeterred, Demme raised the funds independently and eventually secured Corman as the distributor. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue our member bonusRoger Corman series with a conversation about Demme’s 1974 film Caged Heat.Exploring the Depths of Women's Incarceration in Caged HeatIn our discussion, we delve into the themes and statements Demme makes about institutional oppression, mental health, and unethical medical practices within the prison system. We also examine how the film attaches power to sexuality, potentially empowering the female characters in a way that was uncommon for the era. Additionally, we touch on the interesting casting choices, particularly Barbara Steele as the prison warden and Warren Miller as the sociopathic doctor, and how these decisions subvert audience expectations.Caged Heat: A Closer Look at the Characters and Filmmaking TechniquesThroughout the episode, we discuss:The relationships between the various inmates and how Demme allows time for character developmentTak Fujimoto's cinematography and the effective use of tracking shotsThe film's balance between comedy and serious momentsThe shocking and powerful sequence involving shock therapyWhile Caged Heat may not be a perfect film, it offers an intriguing look at the women-in-prison subgenre through the lens of Jonathan Demme's early directorial work. The movie's exploration of serious themes, combined with its exploitation elements, makes for an engaging and thought-provoking viewing experience. Although we have some reservations about the film and the subgenre as a whole, we appreciate the conversations it sparks. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Amazon or find other places at JustWatchTheatrical trailerLetterboxdThis is a member bonus episode. We'd love it if you became a member to support our show, but you’d love it because of everything you get. We have monthly member bonus episodes that only members can access. You also get other monthly member bonus episodes, access to members-only Discord channels, and early releases for every episode. Plus, no ads! And you get to vote on the movies we discuss in our members only episodes! What can we say? It pays to be a member. Learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership — visit TruStory FM.