The Next Reel Film Podcast

“I saw you on TV. I love you!”A Reality TV Satire Takes on The Most Dangerous GameBefore The Hunger Games and the reality TV boom of the 2000s, writer-director Daniel Minahan conceived Series 7: The Contenders as a TV show in the mid-90s. After networks passed on the concept, he developed it into a feature film that would serve as a prescient satire of reality television and American gun culture. With a small budget and shooting on digital video to authentically capture the TV aesthetic of the era, Minahan crafted his dark vision of an alternate present where random citizens are forced to kill each other for entertainment. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we wrap up the People Hunting People series with a conversation about Series 7: The Contenders.The Game Show Where Survival is Not OptionalThis reality TV satire follows Dawn (Brooke Smith), a pregnant returning champion who must face off against five new contestants in a government-sanctioned show where ordinary citizens are selected by lottery to kill each other. The film's commitment to never breaking its reality TV frame, from commercial breaks to behind-the-scenes footage, creates an eerily believable world that feels increasingly less satirical and more prophetic with each passing year.Like any good reality show, the producers manipulate situations to create compelling narratives. The "random" selection of contestants conveniently includes Jeff, Dawn's former high school friend and romantic interest, leading to an emotional subplot complete with a nostalgic music video they made together. This attention to creating drama through personal connections and backstories mirrors actual reality TV production techniques, making the deadly premise feel disturbingly plausible.Production Choices and Performance HighlightsThe authentic digital video cinematography perfectly captures the TV aesthetic of the eraBrooke Smith delivers a compelling performance as the pregnant returning championWill Arnett's narration adds the perfect reality TV toneThe integration of surveillance footage and multiple camera perspectives enhances the realismStrong supporting performances, particularly from Merritt Weaver as the youngest contestantThe film's dark humor effectively balances entertainment with social commentaryWhile box office numbers were modest, Series 7: The Contenders has developed a cult following for its ahead-of-its-time commentary on reality television and violence as entertainment. The film's examination of how media packaging can normalize extreme behavior remains relevant today, perhaps even more so than when it was released. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch our conversation on YouTube!Watch this on Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchTheatrical trailerLetterboxd Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!Here’s where you can find us around the internet:The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“Never underestimate a man who’s got nothing to lose.”The Most Dangerous Game Gets a 90s Action MakeoverIn 1994, director Ernest R. Dickerson took on his second feature film following his directorial debut with Juice. After years as Spike Lee's cinematographer, Dickerson was ready to tackle this action-thriller starring Ice-T as a homeless man hunted by wealthy thrill-seekers. The film drew inspiration from the 1924 short story "The Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Connell, updating it with a contemporary urban twist and social commentary. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the People Hunting People series with a conversation about Surviving the Game.Hunting Down What Makes This Film TickThe film assembles an impressive ensemble cast including Rutger Hauer, Charles S. Dutton, Gary Busey, F. Murray Abraham, and John C. McGinley. While Ice-T delivers a solid performance as Mason, the homeless man targeted for sport, it's the eccentric hunters who steal the show. Furthermore, the film explores themes of class divide and entitlement through its intense cat-and-mouse premise, though some logical gaps in the hunters' abilities occasionally strain credibility.Deep Diving into the Woods and CharactersGary Busey's dinner table monologue about training and killing his dog stands as the memorable highlightDickerson's direction shows his cinematographer's eye, particularly in a Blade Runner-inspired shot of Rutger HauerStuart Copeland's score starts strong but becomes less effective as the film progresses... at least per AndyThe film's Pacific Northwest setting (actually shot in Washington, not Oregon as stated) provides a compelling backdropCharles S. Dutton's casting as a seemingly benevolent shelter worker who reveals darker motives works particularly wellThe film oddly uses Philadelphia stock footage to represent Seattle in the finaleThe Trophy Room VerdictDespite some narrative shortcomings and questionable hunter competency, Surviving the Game delivers exactly what you'd want from a 90s action thriller. The stellar cast elevates the material beyond its B-movie roots, while the social commentary adds welcome depth to the hunt. Both hosts thoroughly enjoyed this bonkers entry in the People Hunting People series. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch our conversation on YouTube!Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal MaterialLetterboxdGary Busey and Gailard Sartain, Coach Chuck Sketch, Tulsa OK '74 Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!Here’s where you can find us around the internet:The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“What I needed was not a new weapon, but a new animal.”Setting the Stage for the Ultimate HuntIn 1932, RKO Pictures produced The Most Dangerous Game while simultaneously building elaborate jungle sets for their upcoming production of King Kong. Based on Richard Connell's 1924 short story, the film became one of the earliest to explore the concept of humans hunting humans. Using the same jungle sets and several cast members who would later appear in King Kong, including Fay Wray, directors Irving Pichel and Ernest B. Schoedsack crafted this taut 63-minute thriller on a modest budget. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we kick off the People Hunting People series with this 1932 film The Most Dangerous Game.Pre-Code Thrills and Dark PsychologyThe film's pre-Code status allowed for surprisingly graphic content, including human heads displayed in jars and mounted on walls. Originally, even more shocking footage was shot, including fully stuffed human corpses positioned in death poses, though these scenes were ultimately cut. As Bob Rainsford and Eve Trowbridge run through the jungle, their clothing becomes increasingly torn and revealing – another pre-Code element that wouldn't have made it past censors a few years later.The film's exploration of hunting humans as sport raises intriguing questions about civilization versus savagery. Count Zaroff's twisted philosophy about hunting humans being the ultimate game creates a compelling narrative that examines humanity's darker impulses. Leslie Banks delivers a memorably sinister performance as Zaroff, using his real-life facial paralysis to enhance his character's menacing presence.Points of DiscussionThe innovative cinematography, including POV shots through the jungleMax Steiner's adventurous score that becomes diegetic when played on pianoThe film's efficient use of its brief 63-minute runtimeIts enduring influence on the "humans hunting humans" subgenreThe rapid development of the central romanceThis lean, atmospheric thriller maintains its impact even after 90 years. While some elements feel dated, The Most Dangerous Game effectively establishes many tropes that would define the "hunting humans" subgenre. We found much to admire in this tightly-crafted adventure, particularly its exploration of humanity's capacity for both civilization and savagery. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal Material and on AudibleLetterboxd Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!Here’s where you can find us around the internet:The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“We all have our devils, my dear.”Roger Corman's Exploitation Era in the PhilippinesIn the early 1970s, Roger Corman discovered he could stretch his production dollars further by filming in the Philippines. He partnered with established Filipino director Gerardo de Leon, known for his award-winning films and work in the Filipino film industry since 1938. Despite de Leon's prestigious background, Corman convinced him to direct Women in Cages, though de Leon would later distance himself from exploitation films. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue our member bonus Roger Corman series with a conversation about Women in Cages.Breaking Free from Prison Film ConventionsPete and Andy engage in a spirited debate about the merits of Women in Cages, with Andy finding more depth than expected while Pete struggles with its exploitation elements. The film follows Jeff, a naive American woman framed by her drug-dealing boyfriend and imprisoned in a corrupt facility run by a sadistic guard played by Pam Grier. Through their discussion, they explore how the film attempts to balance serious themes with exploitation requirements.Deeper Themes Behind Prison BarsStrong performance by Pam Grier as Alabama, the complex and ruthless prison guardExamination of power dynamics and corruption within the prison system, though Pete questions if these themes truly landControversial portrayal of violence and nudity that divides our hostsNoteworthy ending that leaves a lasting impact about women trapped in cycles of abuseDiscussion of de Leon's reluctant participation in exploitation cinemaAnalysis of how the film handles themes of sexual exploitation and systemic corruptionClassic Corman cost-cutting: Film set in a Spanish-speaking country but shot in the PhilippinesWhile Pete finds the film's exploitation elements overwhelming, distracting, and worst of all—boring, Andy appreciates its attempts to tackle deeper themes about women trapped in various forms of imprisonment. Whether viewing it as pure exploitation or something more substantial, Women in Cages represents an interesting chapter in Corman's production history and de Leon's career. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerLetterboxdThis is a member bonus episode. We'd love it if you became a member to support our show, but you’d love it because of everything you get. We have monthly member bonus episodes that only members can access. You also get other monthly member bonus content, access to members-only Discord channels, and early releases for every episode. Plus, no ads! And you get to vote on the movies we discuss in our members only episodes! What can we say? It pays to be a member. Learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership — visit TruStory FM.

“You can make the world swear King Kong is ten stories tall and Mary Pickford a virgin at 40, yet you can’t convince starving voters that a turncoat socialist is a menace to everything California holds dear? You’re barely trying.”David Fincher's Personal Connection to Old HollywoodAfter decades of development, David Fincher finally brought his late father Jack Fincher's screenplay about Herman J. Mankiewicz to life. Originally planned for production in the late 1990s with Kevin Spacey and Jodie Foster attached, the project stalled when studios balked at Fincher's insistence on shooting in black and white. Following Jack Fincher's death in 2003, David continued developing the script, eventually partnering with Netflix who gave him creative freedom to realize his father's vision. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we return to our David Fincher series with a conversation about Mank.Writing History Through a Modern LensIn discussing Mank, we explore how Fincher approaches the controversial story of who really wrote Citizen Kane, while examining the film's portrayal of 1930s Hollywood politics through a contemporary perspective. We debate the historical accuracy of certain story elements and character portrayals, particularly regarding Herman Mankiewicz's political leanings and relationship with William Randolph Hearst.Behind the Scenes of Old HollywoodThe film raises interesting questions about the balance between historical accuracy and dramatic storytelling. While some criticize the film's creative liberties with Mankiewicz's political views and relationships, we discuss whether these changes serve a greater purpose in crafting a compelling narrative. This leads to a broader conversation about the responsibilities filmmakers have when telling true stories and whether artistic license can be justified in service of a larger truth.Key Discussion PointsOldman's compelling performance as Mankiewicz... without prostheticsThe technical achievements in recreating the period look using modern digital toolsAmanda Seyfried's standout portrayal of Marion DaviesTrent Reznor and Atticus Ross's period-appropriate score recorded remotely during COVIDThe film's exploration of fake news and media manipulation then and nowCrafting a Modern ClassicWhile not ranking among Fincher's most dynamic works as far as we’re concerned, Mank succeeds as both a love letter to classic Hollywood and a thoughtful examination of the creative process. Despite some historical liberties, the film's technical excellence and strong performances make it a worthy addition to Fincher's filmography. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesCheck out these other Mank-adjacent conversations in The Next Reel’s family of podcasts:Movies We Like: Cinematographer Erik Messerschmidt on ChinatownThe Film Board: Erik Messerschmidt joins Justin Jaeger and Tommy Metz III for a Conversation on The KillerThe Film Board: MankFind places to watch this at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerLetterboxd Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!Here’s where you can find us around the internet:The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“You must start thinking of the spiral, the spiral that’s coming into your head.”An Overlooked Horror GemIn 1987, Spanish filmmaker Bigas Luna ventured into the horror genre with an innovative approach to storytelling. Working with a budget of $2 million, Luna crafted a unique narrative that would blend psychological horror with commentary on cinema itself. Despite its limited theatrical release and modest box office returns (to be generous), the film would go on to win several awards and be nominated for others. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we wrap up this return to the 'Spoiled. Rotten? Twist Endings' series with a conversation about Luna’s 1987 film Anguish.Eyes Wide Open for This Horror ExperienceThe film follows John Pressman (Michael Lerner), a troubled ophthalmologist's orderly whose overbearing mother (Zelda Rubinstein) exercises an unusual amount of control over his life. As their story unfolds, Luna takes viewers on an unexpected journey that challenges conventional horror storytelling.A Deeper Look into Cinema's Dark cornersWe discuss how the film's unique approach to storytelling enhances rather than diminishes its impact. While we initially found the first act somewhat challenging, we agree that the film's revelations make these early moments more meaningful in retrospect. We particularly praise Michael Lerner's performance and Zelda Rubinstein's uniquely unsettling presence.Key Elements of Discussion:The effective use of sound design and visual elements to create a hypnotic atmosphereThe film's commentary on cinema and audience experienceThe innovative approach to horror storytellingThe challenges of distribution and accessibility in modern timesThe potential impact of a modern remakeThe film's lasting influence on horror cinemaAnguish proves itself to be a fascinating and innovative piece of horror cinema that deserves wider recognition. Despite its limited availability, this hypnotic and unsettling film rewards viewers with its creative storytelling and memorable performances. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchTheatrical trailerLetterboxd Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!Here’s where you can find us around the internet:The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“Lucy Harbin was declared legally insane today.”William Castle Brings Joan Crawford Back to HorrorIn the early 1960s, William Castle was known for his theatrical gimmicks and B-movie horror films. After the success of Whatever Happened to Baby Jane?, Castle saw an opportunity to work with Hollywood legend Joan Crawford. He enlisted acclaimed writer Robert Bloch, fresh off his success with Psycho, to craft a psychological thriller that would showcase Crawford's talents while delivering the shock value his audiences craved. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the 'Spoiled. Rotten? Twist Endings' series with a conversation about Strait-Jacket.Axe Murders and Plot Twists: Examining Psychological HorrorThe film follows Lucy Harbin (Crawford), who returns home after spending 20 years in an asylum for brutally murdering her husband and his lover. While the movie sets up an interesting exploration of psychological trauma and mother-daughter relationships, Pete and Andy discuss how the third act reveals impact what could have been a compelling dramatic story. They debate whether the film's ending undermines the careful character development established throughout the narrative.Beyond the Blade: Production Elements and PerformancesThe discussion delves into several fascinating aspects of the film's production and impact:Crawford's commanding performance and rangeWilliam Castle's marketing tactics, including distributing cardboard axes to moviegoersThe film's interesting use of shadows and darkness in murder scenesProduct placement history with Pepsi due to Crawford's connection to the companyGeorge Kennedy's memorable performance in his small roleThe evolution of the "hagsploitation" subgenreStrait-Jacket delivers as both a psychological thriller and a showcase for Crawford's talents, though some narrative choices may divide audiences. The film offers interesting commentary on societal treatment of women and mental illness, even if it doesn't fully capitalize on these themes. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerLetterboxd Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!Here’s where you can find us around the internet:The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“You know what I like about amnesia?”A Psychological Thriller with Twisting MemoriesIn 1991, psychological thrillers were hitting their stride, delivering increasingly complex narratives filled with shocking twists. Wolfgang Petersen's Shattered emerged during this period as a stylish entry in the genre, starring Tom Berenger and Greta Scacchi. The film would mark another step in Petersen's Hollywood journey following his success with German cinema. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the 'Spoiled. Rotten? Twist Endings' series with a conversation about Shattered.Navigating the Fragments of Memory and IdentityThe film's elaborate plot twists and amnesia-driven narrative provide plenty of material for discussion. We thoroughly enjoy the movie's over-the-top nature and soap opera-style revelations, though we differ on its rewatchability. Pete suggests that much of the fun comes from discovering the surprises for the first time, while Andy argues the film's entertainment value persists even when you know what's coming. We also examine the plausibility of certain character actions, particularly regarding Greta Scacchi's performance and her character's behavior in solo scenes.Key Elements of DiscussionThe impressive car crash sequence and its technical achievementsBob Hoskins' scene-stealing performance as a pet shop owner/private investigatorAlan Silvestri's replacement score after Angelo Badalamenti's original was rejectedThe film's noir-influenced cinematography by Laszlo KovacsTom Berenger's ability to portray both innocence and menace effectivelyThe psychological accuracy of the amnesia portrayed in the filmDespite its modest box office performance, Shattered delivers an entertaining blend of 90s thriller conventions with enough style and memorable performances to warrant attention. As a film that fully embraces its melodramatic twists while maintaining its noir-influenced style, it proves to be an engaging entry in the psychological thriller genre. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal MaterialLetterboxd Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!Here’s where you can find us around the internet:The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“To be absolutely blunt about it, Nicholas believes that Elizabeth may have been interred... prematurely.”Roger Corman's Poe Adaptations Take FlightFollowing the success of House of Usher in 1960, American International Pictures eagerly greenlit another Edgar Allan Poe adaptation with Roger Corman at the helm. Richard Matheson returned to pen the screenplay, significantly expanding Poe's short story about torture during the Spanish Inquisition into a gothic tale of madness and revenge. With Vincent Price signed on to star and Daniel Haller designing the elaborate sets, Corman aimed to outdo their previous success with an even more ambitious production, working with a budget of $300,000. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Roger Corman series with a conversation about The Pit and the Pendulum.Swinging Between Horror and DramaThe film generates interesting discussion around its adaptation choices, particularly how it expands beyond Poe's original story. While Andy found entertainment value in Vincent Price's increasingly unhinged performance and the gothic atmosphere, Pete felt the film didn't deliver enough on its titular torture devices. Both hosts praise the impressive pendulum mechanism and sprawling dungeon sets, though they note the film saves these elements primarily for the finale.More Than Just Torture DevicesThe hosts explore Richard Matheson's screenplay contributions across multiple Corman-Poe films, discuss the film's influence on young Stephen King, and analyze how it compares to other adaptations of the period. They also examine the strong box office performance that helped cement AIP's commitment to more Poe films.Key Discussion Points:Barbara Steele's memorable performance as ElizabethThe effective use of color and dream sequencesDebates over the film's marketing using different title variationsThe elaborate castle sets despite the modest budgetJohn Kerr's portrayal of Francis BarnardThe final shot revealing Elizabeth's fateWhile Pete found the film somewhat lacking in delivering on its horror and torture premise, Andy appreciated its atmospheric gothic qualities and Vincent Price's commanding presence. Despite their differing opinions, both agree The Pit and the Pendulum represents an important entry in Corman's Poe cycle that helped establish a formula for future adaptations. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal MaterialLetterboxdThis is a member bonus episode. We'd love it if you became a member to support our show, but you’d love it because of everything you get. We have monthly member bonus episodes like this that only members can access. You also get access to members-only Discord channels, early ad-free releases for every episode, pre- and post-show chats, and more. Plus, you get to vote on the movies we discuss in our members only episodes! What can we say? It pays to be a member. Learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership — visit TruStory FM.

“You haven't got an ounce of understanding or emotion in your body. You died the moment you were born. And when your heart finally stops beating, it'll be a mere formality.”From Novel to Cold War Spy ThrillerDerek Marlowe's first novel caught the attention of producers looking to capitalize on the success of spy thrillers in the 1960s. With Anthony Mann set to direct and Lawrence Harvey to star, they began production in 1967. However, Mann's unexpected death during filming led to Harvey taking over directorial duties for the final portion of the shoot. Furthermore, Frank Sinatra's daily calls to the production demanding his wife Mia Farrow's return added additional tension to the complicated shoot. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we wrap up the 1968 Crime Films series with a conversation about A Dandy in Aspic.A Double Agent Trapped in AspicThe film follows a Russian double agent ordered to track down and assassinate himself, creating an intriguing premise that never quite reaches its full potential. While the spy thriller elements and Cold War setting provide fertile ground for tension and intrigue, the execution falls short of contemporaries like The Spy Who Came in from the Cold. Additionally, Mia Farrow's character feels superfluous, appearing everywhere without clear purpose to the plot.Other Elements We DiscussLawrence Harvey's dour performance and directorial contributionThe Cold War atmosphere of London and Berlin locationsQuincy Jones's '60s-era scoreThe creative marionette title sequenceTom Courtney's engaging supporting performanceThe film's peculiar title and its cultural contextThe dangerous AVUS racing circuit featured in the finaleDespite its flaws, A Dandy in Aspic offers an interesting take on the spy genre with solid performances and authentic Cold War locations. Though we found the film somewhat uneven and less engaging than other spy thrillers of the era, its unique premise and historical significance make it worth examining. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchWatch it on the webTheatrical trailerOriginal MaterialLetterboxd Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!Here’s where you can find us around the internet:The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE.